Offc Action Outgoing

HUAWEI

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 79310757

 

Mark:  HUAWEI

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

NTD UNIVATION; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGE

10th Floor, Tower C,

Beijing Global Trade Center,

100013 Beijing

CHINA

 

 

Applicant:  HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. N/A

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

International Registration No. 1590923

 

Notice of Provisional Full Refusal

 

Deadline for responding.  The USPTO must receive applicant’s response within six months of the “date on which the notification was sent to WIPO (mailing date)” located on the WIPO cover letter, or the U.S. application will be abandoned (see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks-application-process/abandoned-applications for information on abandonment).  To confirm the mailing date, go to the USPTO’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) database at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/, select “US Serial, Registration, or Reference No.,” enter the U.S. application serial number in the blank text box, and click on “Documents.”  The mailing date used to calculate the response deadline is the “Create/Mail Date” of the “IB-1rst Refusal Note.” 

 

Respond to this Office action using the USPTO’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.

 

Discussion of provisional full refusal.  This is a provisional full refusal of the request for extension of protection to the United States of the international registration, known in the United States as a U.S. application based on Trademark Act Section 66(a).  See 15 U.S.C. §§1141f(a), 1141h(c). 

 

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS

 

The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

  • Amendment to Identification of Goods and Services Required
  • Mark Description Required
  • Email Address and U.S. Counsel Required

 

AMENDMENT TO IDENTFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES REQUIRED

 

The wording “steering apparatus,” “photovoltaic apparatus,” “surveying apparatus,” “sensors,” “speed checking apparatus for vehicles,” “mobile power source,” “testing apparatus,” “lasers for cosmetic purposes,” “diagnostic apparatus,” “apparatus for use in medical analysis,” “remote control vehicles,” “Electric vehicles,” “electric scooters,” “air vehicles,” and “theft prevention installations” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because it does not sufficiently specify the nature of these goods. The wording “navigation services” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because it does not adequately indicate what type of navigation services are offered.   See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. 

 

The identification of goods and services contains parentheses and brackets.  Generally, applicants should not use parentheses and brackets in identifications in their applications so as to avoid confusion with the USPTO’s practice of using parentheses and brackets in registrations to indicate goods and services that have been deleted from registrations or in an affidavit of incontestability to indicate goods and/or services not claimed.  See TMEP §1402.12.  The only exception is that parenthetical information is permitted in identifications in an application if it serves to explain or translate the matter immediately preceding the parenthetical phrase in such a way that it does not affect the clarity or scope of the identification, e.g., “fried tofu pieces (abura-age).”  Id.

 

Therefore, applicant must remove the parentheses and brackets from the identification and incorporate any parenthetical or bracketed information into the description of the goods and services.

 

Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate (changes indicated in bold and strikethrough): 

 

Class 9: Liquid crystal displays (LCD) with large screens; touch screen pens; vehicle radios; navigation apparatus for vehicles [on-board computers]; rearview cameras for vehicles; digital video recorder for vehicles; electronic book readers; inverters [electricity]; photovoltaic inverters; parking sensors for vehicles; voltage stabilizing power supply; voltage regulators for vehicles; simulators for the steering and control of vehicles; steering apparatus, automatic, for vehicles, namely, simulators for the steering of vehicles; accumulators, electric, for vehicles; accumulators, electric; chargers for electric accumulators; charging stations for electric vehicles; photovoltaic inverters apparatus for the production of electricity; electronic pens; surveying apparatus and instruments; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; electric sensors; speed checking apparatus for vehicles in the nature of odometers; photovoltaic cells; mobile power source in the nature of rechargeable batteries

 

Class 10: Heart rate monitoring apparatus; sanitary masks for medical purposes; massage apparatus; testing apparatus for medical purposes, namely, Medical diagnostic apparatus for testing for viruses; lasers for cosmetic purposes, namely, lasers for surgical use; ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus for medical purposes; physical exercise apparatus, for medical purposes; X-ray apparatus for use in medical analysis; body composition monitors; body fat monitors

 

Class 12: Remote control land vehicles, other than toys; electric land vehicles; electric cars; automobiles; hybrid cars; automobile chassis; electric motors for cars; automobile engines; self-driving cars; driverless cars [autonomous cars]; self-balancing electric bicycles; bicycles; self-balancing unicycles; electric motor scooters; aerial conveyors; pushchairs; electric wheelchairs; camera drones; air vehicles in the nature of aircrafts; electric theft prevention installations in the nature of steering wheel locks for vehicles; tires for vehicle wheels; vehicle seats; air bags [safety devices for automobiles]; airbags for vehicles

 

Class 39: Providing road and traffic information; arranging of passenger transportation services for others via an online application; transportation information; management of vehicular traffic flow through advanced communications network and technology; air navigation services; Aeronautical radio navigation services; rental of navigational systems; GPS navigation services; rental of GPS equipment for navigational purposes; car sharing services; physical storage of electronically stored data or documents; delivery of goods; escorting of travellers; arranging of transportation for travel tours; providing driving directions for travel purposes; travel guide services; providing information about travel, via the internet

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and services, but not to broaden or expand the goods and services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods and services may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).  Additionally, for applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments is limited by the international class assigned by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (International Bureau); and the classification of goods and services may not be changed from that assigned by the International Bureau.  37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b).  Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, classes may not be added or goods and services transferred from one existing class to another.  37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §1401.03(d).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

MARK DESCRIPTION REQUIRED

 

Applicant must submit a description of the mark, because one was not included in the application.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  Applications for marks not in standard characters must include an accurate and concise description of the entire mark that identifies all the literal and design elements.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §§808.01, 808.02, 808.03(b).  In this case, the drawing of the mark is not in standard characters.

 

The following description is suggested, if accurate:  The mark consists of the wording “HUAWEI” below a flower design.

 

EMAIL ADDRESS AND U.S. COUNSEL REQUIRED

 

Email address required.  Applicant must provide applicant’s email address, which is a requirement for a complete application.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(2); Mandatory Electronic Filing & Specimen Requirements, Examination Guide 1-20, at III.A. (Rev. Feb. 2020).  Applicant’s email address cannot be identical to the listed primary correspondence email address of any attorney retained to represent applicant in this application.  See Examination Guide 1-20, at III.A. 

 

Applicant must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney to respond to or appeal the provisional refusal.  An applicant whose domicile is located outside of the United States or its territories is foreign-domiciled and must be represented by an attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state or territory.  37 C.F.R. §§2.11(a), 11.14; Requirement of U.S.-Licensed Attorney for Foreign-Domiciled Trademark Applicants & Registrants, Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A. (Rev. Sept. 2019).  An individual applicant’s domicile is the place a person resides and intends to be the person’s principal home.  37 C.F.R. §2.2(o); Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A.  A juristic entity’s domicile is the principal place of business; i.e., headquarters, where a juristic entity applicant’s senior executives or officers ordinarily direct and control the entity’s activities.  37 C.F.R. §2.2(o); Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A.  Because applicant is foreign-domiciled, applicant must appoint such a U.S.-licensed attorney qualified to practice under 37 C.F.R. §11.14 as its representative before the application may proceed to registration.  37 C.F.R. §2.11(a).  See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks-getting-started/why-hire-private-trademark-attorney for more information. 

 

Only a U.S.-licensed attorney can take action on an application on behalf of a foreign-domiciled applicant.  37 C.F.R. §2.11(a).  Accordingly, the USPTO will not communicate further with applicant about the application beyond this Office action or permit applicant to make future submissions in this application. 

 

To appoint or designate a U.S.-licensed attorney.  To appoint an attorney, applicant should submit a completed Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Change Address or Representation form at http://teas.gov.uspto.report/wna/ccr/car.  The newly-appointed attorney must submit a TEAS Response to Examining Attorney Office Action form at http://teas.gov.uspto.report/office/roa/ indicating that an appointment of attorney has been made and address all other refusals or requirements in this action, if any.  Alternatively, if applicant retains an attorney before filing the response, the attorney can respond to this Office action by using the appropriate TEAS response form and provide his or her attorney information in the form and sign it as applicant’s attorney.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1)(ii).

 

ASSISTANCE

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 

 

The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

Robert N. Guliano

/Robert N. Guliano/

robert.guliano@uspto.gov

571-272-0174

Examining Attorney

Law Office 105

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed