FK
FK Bearing Group Co., Ltd.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79299655 |
| Registration Number | 6488716 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
Timeline
| 2020-09-23 | Application Filed |
| 2020-12-14 | Location: NEW APPLICATION PROCESSING |
| 2020-12-14 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2021-01-11 | Transaction Date |
| 2021-09-21 | Trademark Registered |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  FK Bearing Group Co., Ltd. |
| Address | 132 Pengmei Road, Nanan City 362300 Fujian CN |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CN |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 7 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,019,021,023,024,031,034,035 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0071 | Bearings as parts of machines |
| GS0071 | Bearings as parts of machines |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2020-12-10 | 1 REPR M: |
| LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | 2021-01-07 | 2 LIMI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2021-01-11 | 3 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2021-01-15 | 4 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2021-02-11 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2021-02-19 | 6 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2021-02-20 | 7 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2021-03-02 | 8 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2021-03-02 | 9 RFCS P: |
| CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | 2021-03-13 | 10 CRCV M: |
| CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | 2021-03-19 | 11 CORN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2021-03-22 | 12 RFNT P: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2021-05-31 | 13 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2021-05-31 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2021-05-31 | 15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2021-06-01 | 16 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2021-06-16 | 17 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2021-07-06 | 18 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2021-07-06 | 19 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2021-07-29 | 20 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2021-07-29 | 21 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2021-07-29 | 22 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2021-09-21 | 23 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2021-12-21 | 24 FICR P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | 2022-03-10 | 25 FIMP P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2022-03-11 | 26 FICS P: |
| FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2022-04-04 | 27 FINV P: |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 