Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 79246096 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Max Vern |
Attorney Docket Number | 34489/28 |
Law Office Assigned | M10 |
Employee Name | PHILLIPS, WENDELL SHAR |
2018-10-16 | Application Filed |
2019-09-03 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2019-09-03 | Status: Live/Pending |
2019-09-04 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Redarc Electronics Pty Ltd. |
Entity Statement | Australian Proprietary Company, Limited By Shares |
Address | 23 Brodie Road North Lonsdale SA 5160 AU |
Legal Entity Type | |
Legal Entity State | AU |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Automotive electronic control devices for controlling the supply of electrical current to electrical loads of a vehicle; automotive electronic control devices for controlling electrical connection between an electrical load and a battery, namely, power inverters, voltage reducers, charge equalisers, voltage regulators, dual battery isolator units, voltage boosters, voltage sensors, timing devices, sine wave inverters, power supplies, batteries, and battery chargers; all of the foregoing goods excluding navigational apparatus and equipment |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2018-11-22 | 1 REPR M: |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2018-11-26 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2018-11-30 | 3 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2019-01-24 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2019-02-01 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2019-02-02 | 6 RFCR E:E-Mail |
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2019-02-09 | 7 RFRR P: |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2019-02-10 | 8 RFCS P: |
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2019-03-02 | 9 RFNT P: |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2019-08-09 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2019-08-09 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2019-08-10 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2019-09-03 | 13 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2019-09-03 | 14 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2019-09-03 | 15 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2020-03-16 | 16 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2020-03-17 | 17 MAB2 E:E-Mail |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2020-04-22 | 18 OPNR P: |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2020-04-22 | 19 OPNS P: |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | 2020-05-08 | 20 OPNX P: |
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2021-03-16 | 21 FICR P: |
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2021-03-16 | 22 FICS P: |
FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2021-04-04 | 23 FINT P: |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.