JAMS
Carlos Alberto Salmon Garza
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79242168 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Law Office Assigned | N50 |
| Employee Name | LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPH |
Timeline
| 2018-01-11 | Application Filed |
| 2019-05-08 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2019-11-27 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2019-11-27 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Carlos Alberto Salmon Garza |
| Address | Mayran 852, Torreón JardÃn, Torreón Coahuila MX |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
| Legal Entity State | MX |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 45 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2018-10-04 | 1 REPR M: |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2018-10-10 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2018-10-10 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2018-10-12 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2018-10-13 | 5 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2018-10-16 | 6 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2018-10-29 | 7 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2018-10-29 | 8 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2018-11-17 | 9 RFNT P: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2019-04-26 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2019-05-06 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2019-05-06 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2019-05-06 | 13 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2019-05-08 | 14 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2019-05-09 | 15 CNSL S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2019-11-27 | 16 RCSC S: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2020-03-04 | 17 OPNR P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2020-03-04 | 18 OPNS P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | 2020-03-20 | 19 OPNX P: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2020-06-11 | 20 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2021-02-11 | 21 RCSC S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2021-09-15 | 22 RCCK S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2021-10-05 | 23 RCSC S: |
| SUSPENSION CHECKED ¿ TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | 2022-05-18 | 24 RCCK S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2022-06-03 | 25 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2023-01-27 | 26 RCSC S: |
| SUSPENSION CHECKED ¿ TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | 2023-08-12 | 27 RCCK S: |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2023-08-18 | 28 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2024-01-02 | 29 CNSL S: |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 