Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 79241921 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Ben Natter |
Attorney Docket Number | A548-1 |
Law Office Assigned | L40 |
Employee Name | EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRI |
2018-07-30 | Application Filed |
2019-07-09 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2019-07-09 | Status: Live/Pending |
2019-07-09 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Crypto Quantique Limited |
Address | 53 Spring Rise, Egham, Surrey TW20 9PP GB |
Legal Entity Type | |
Legal Entity State | GB |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Chipcards; electronic chips for the manufacture of integrated circuits; silicon chips; computer chips; semiconductors; semiconductor chips; photo-semiconductors; microchips; blank electronic chip cards; encoded electronic chip cards containing programming used to enable the chip to be used in digital security, and/or to verify the identity of the chip for use in secure digital protocols; transistors; single electron transistors; integrated circuits; integrated circuit chips for use in digital security, and to verify the identity of the chip for use in secure digital protocols; blank electronic chip cards; RFID chips; labels with integrated RFID chips; tamper evident semiconductor and computer chips; tamper resistant semiconductor and computer chips; computer chipsets for use in transmitting data to and from a central processing unit; computer chipsets for storing and retrieving secret data based on queries from a central processing unit; printed circuit boards; computer hardware for use in cryptography; computer hardware for use in cryptography key management; computer hardware for use in quantum key distribution; computer hardware for use in quantum entanglement; encryption software; security software for use in digital security; software for use in cryptography; software to provide end-to-end encryption; software for secure wireless communication; software for use in public key infrastructure; software for use in identity and access management; software for use in authentication and digital signatures; software for use in cryptography key management; software for use in post-quantum cryptography; software for use in quantum- safe cryptography; software for use in quantum key distribution; software for use in quantum entanglement; random number generator software; random number generator hardware; quantum computing software; quantum computing hardware; software for the creation, development and maintenance of blockchain and cryptocurrencies; photon detectors; single-photon emitters; smart meters; blank smart cards; artificial intelligence apparatus for generating algorithms for use in digital security, for use in network traffic analysis, for cryptoanalysis, and for digital security analysis of software |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2018-10-04 | 1 REPR M: |
LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | 2018-10-05 | 2 LIMI I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2018-10-09 | 3 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2018-10-13 | 4 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2018-11-15 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2018-11-21 | 6 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2018-11-22 | 7 RFCR E:E-Mail |
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2018-12-07 | 8 RFRR P: |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2018-12-07 | 9 RFCS P: |
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2018-12-28 | 10 RFNT P: |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2019-06-05 | 11 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2019-06-10 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2019-06-11 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2019-06-11 | 14 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2019-07-09 | 15 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2019-07-09 | 16 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2019-07-09 | 17 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2020-01-20 | 18 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2020-01-21 | 19 MAB2 E:E-Mail |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2020-03-04 | 20 OPNR P: |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2020-03-04 | 21 OPNS P: |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | 2020-03-20 | 22 OPNX P: |
DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | 2020-04-17 | 23 DETH P: |
NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | 2020-04-18 | 24 DENA E:E-Mail |
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2021-01-20 | 25 FICR P: |
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2021-01-20 | 26 FICS P: |
IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | 2021-01-27 | 27 IRFI M: |
IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | 2021-01-28 | 28 IRRH M: |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.