To: | Stiftelsen Friends (trademarks@johnsonmartinlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 79177360 - FRIENDS - 46483-0004 |
Sent: | 8/21/2018 12:18:31 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM111@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 79177360
MARK: FRIENDS
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Stiftelsen Friends
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 8/21/2018
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NO. 1276003
The Section 2(d) Refusal as to RN 2032383 is withdrawn. The mark cited as a prior-pending application has registered, applicant must respond to the below Section 2(d) Refusal.
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:
SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
Registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark in U.S. Registration No. 5505699. Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq. A copy of the registration is enclosed.
This Refusal applies to applicant’s goods in International Classes 009, 016 and 028.
Trademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that so resembles a registered mark that it is likely a potential consumer would be confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the source of the services of the applicant and registrant. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). A determination of likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) is made on a case-by case basis and the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (C.C.P.A. 1973) aid in this determination. Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Grp., Inc., 637 F.3d 1344, 1349, 98 USPQ2d 1253, 1256 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (citing On-Line Careline, Inc. v. Am. Online, Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1085, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1474 (Fed. Cir. 2000)). Not all the du Pont factors, however, are necessarily relevant or of equal weight, and any one of the factors may control in a given case, depending upon the evidence of record. Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Grp., Inc., 637 F.3d at 1355, 98 USPQ2d at 1260; In re Majestic Distilling Co., 315 F.3d 1311, 1315, 65 USPQ2d 1201, 1204 (Fed. Cir. 2003); see In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d at 1361-62, 177 USPQ at 567.
In this case, the following factors are the most relevant: similarity of the marks, similarity and nature of the services, and similarity of the trade channels of the services. See In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1361-62, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012); In re Dakin’s Miniatures Inc., 59 USPQ2d 1593, 1595-96 (TTAB 1999); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.
SIMILARITY OF THE MARKS
In a likelihood of confusion determination, the marks in their entireties are compared for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v).
Marks may be confusingly similar in appearance where similar terms or phrases or similar parts of terms or phrases appear in the compared marks and create a similar overall commercial impression. See Crocker Nat’l Bank v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 228 USPQ 689, 690-91 (TTAB 1986), aff’d sub nom. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 811 F.2d 1490, 1495, 1 USPQ2d 1813, 1817 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (finding COMMCASH and COMMUNICASH confusingly similar); In re Corning Glass Works, 229 USPQ 65, 66 (TTAB 1985) (finding CONFIRM and CONFIRMCELLS confusingly similar); In re Pellerin Milnor Corp., 221 USPQ 558, 560 (TTAB 1983) (finding MILTRON and MILLTRONICS confusingly similar); TMEP §1207.01(b)(ii)-(iii). Slight differences in the sound of similar marks will not avoid a likelihood of confusion. In re Energy Telecomm. & Elec. Ass’n, 222 USPQ 350, 351 (TTAB 1983); see In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1367, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1912 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
Consumer confusion has been held likely for marks that do not physically sound or look alike but that convey the same idea, stimulate the same mental reaction, or may have the same overall meaning. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Conway, 419 F.2d 1332, 1336, 164 USPQ 301, 304 (C.C.P.A. 1970) (holding MISTER STAIN likely to be confused with MR. CLEAN on competing cleaning products); see In re M. Serman & Co., 223 USPQ 52, 53 (TTAB 1984) (holding CITY WOMAN for ladies’ blouses likely to be confused with CITY GIRL for a variety of female clothing); H. Sichel Sohne, GmbH v. John Gross & Co., 204 USPQ 257, 260-61 (TTAB 1979) (holding BLUE NUN for wines likely to be confused with BLUE CHAPEL for the same goods); Ralston Purina Co. v. Old Ranchers Canning Co., 199 USPQ 125, 128 (TTAB 1978) (holding TUNA O’ THE FARM for canned chicken likely to be confused with CHICKEN OF THE SEA for canned tuna); Downtowner Corp. v. Uptowner Inns, Inc., 178 USPQ 105, 109 (TTAB 1973) (holding UPTOWNER for motor inn and restaurant services likely to be confused with DOWNTOWNER for the same services); TMEP §1207.01(b).
In the present case, the applicant’s mark is the term FRIENDS in standard characters, and the registered mark is the term FRIENDS in stylized purple and pink font with a small butterfly design above the letter “S”. Here, because applicant’s mark and the registered mark are the same term, and because applicant’s standard character mark could be presented in the same manner of display as the registered mark, the two marks are confusingly similar.
COMPARISON OF THE GOODS
Generally, the greater degree of similarity between the applied-for mark and the registered mark, the lesser the degree of similarity between the goods and/or services of the respective parties that is required to support a finding of likelihood of confusion. In re Davey Prods. Pty Ltd., 92 USPQ2d 1198, 1202 (TTAB 2009); In re Thor Tech, Inc., 90 USPQ2d 1634, 1636 (TTAB 2009).
The goods and/or services of the parties need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion. See On-line Careline Inc. v. Am. Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1086, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1475 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Recot, Inc. v. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d 1894, 1898 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“[E]ven if the goods in question are different from, and thus not related to, one another in kind, the same goods can be related in the mind of the consuming public as to the origin of the goods.”); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).
The respective goods and/or services need only be “related in some manner and/or if the circumstances surrounding their marketing [be] such that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the goods] emanate from the same source.” Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting 7-Eleven Inc. v. Wechsler, 83 USPQ2d 1715, 1724 (TTAB 2007)); Gen. Mills Inc. v. Fage Dairy Processing Indus. SA, 100 USPQ2d 1584, 1597 (TTAB 2011); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).
With respect to applicant’s and registrant’s goods and/or services, the question of likelihood of confusion is determined based on the description of the goods and/or services stated in the application and registration at issue, not on extrinsic evidence of actual use. See, e.g., Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369-70, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Octocom Sys. Inc. v. Hous. Computers Servs. Inc., 918 F.2d 937, 942, 16 USPQ2d 1783, 1787 (Fed. Cir. 1990).
In this case, neither the application nor the registration contains any limitations regarding trade channels for the goods and/or services and therefore it is assumed that registrant’s and applicant’s goods and/or services are provided everywhere that is normal for such goods and/or services to be provided.
Applicant’s goods in International Classes 009, 016 and 028 are identified as:
International Class 009:
Gramophone records featuring music, dance events, music and artistic performances, concerts and festivals; audio cartridges featuring music; audio tapes featuring music; compact discs featuring music and films related to the prevention of bullying; blank audio and video discs, videotapes and video cassettes, unrecorded or recorded for images and/or sound and/or other information; blank magnetic data carriers; blank recordable discs; audio discs featuring music and films; video discs featuring music and films; exposed cinematographic film; exposed photographic film; computer software for use on mobile and cellular phones, personal computers, and home video game consoles for providing computer games and educational programs regarding bullying; computer game software; home video game software; interactive game software; interactive multimedia software featuring audio and video information on the subject of treatments, procedures and alternatives related to the work against bullying; computer and video game cartridges and discs for use with electronic games apparatus; pre-recorded interactive CDs featuring videos in the field of education
International Class 016:
Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, not included in other classes namely, adhesive note paper, blank or partially printed paper labels, blank paper notebooks, peel-and-stick labels, and calendared paper; printed matter namely, paper signs, books, manuals, curricula, newsletters, informational cards and brochures in the field of research, education and work to prevent bullying; bookbinding material; photographs; stationery; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; printed instructional and teaching material in the field of research, education, and work to prevent bullying; plastic materials for packaging for general use; posters; educational books in the field of research, education, and work against bullying; cards, namely, note cards and business cards; postcards; greeting cards; calendars; prints; gift bags; gift boxes; notepads; paper with adhesive reverse side for stationery; pens, pencils and crayons; stationery pins and tacks; diaries; gift tags and luggage tags of paper and cardboard; stickers; ring binders; non-electronic personal planners; printed folded sheet articles in the field of research, education and work to prevent bullying; publications, namely, educational publications, namely, educational learning cards, flash cards, activity cards, workbooks, textbooks, activity books, story books, puzzle books, printed puzzles, teacher guides, manuals, posters and educational booklets in the fields of research, education and work to prevent bullying; brochures about research, education, and work to prevent bullying; leaflets about research, education, and work to prevent bullying; promotional material, namely, hand-outs and printed visuals all in the field of research, education, and work to prevent bullying; placards of paper or cardboard; marketing materials, namely, pens, writing pads and pins namely, push pins, corkboard pins, and drawing pins; informational sheets about research, education, and work to prevent bullying; booklets for information about research, education, and work to prevent bullying; informational flyers featuring research, education, and work to prevent bullying
International Class 028:
Children's educational games in the field of bullying, electronic games for teaching, memory and recall games, and target games, all for use with a television screen, video monitor or electronic display apparatus; amusement game machines for use with a television screen, video monitor or electronic display apparatus; playing cards
The registration identifies the following goods in International Classes 009, 016 and 028:
International Class 009:
Computer game software; video game software; downloadable computer game software; downloadable video game software; electronic game software for cellular telephones; decorative magnets; refrigerator magnets; blank USB flash drives; video recordings and downloadable video recordings, both featuring children's entertainment and animated cartoons; downloadable films and television programs featuring children's entertainment and animated cartoons provided via a video on demand service; musical sound recordings; motion picture films and television programs featuring children's entertainment and animated cartoons; sunglasses; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of children's books, picture books, story books, comic books, travel books, educational books in the field of early reading and books in the field of construction toys; downloadable images for use as computer wallpaper or screensavers; decorative ornaments for cellular telephones; cases adapted for carrying computer games
International Class 016:
Children's books; picture books; story books; comic books; travel books; children's activity books; educational books in the field of early reading; books in the field of construction toys; postcards; greeting cards; posters; stickers; trading cards; albums for collecting stickers and trading cards; calendars; stationery; envelopes; writing and drawing pads; pen and pencil cases; pencil sharpeners; erasers; instruction manuals for construction toys; gift bags; decorative pencil top ornaments; party ornaments of paper; notebooks; diaries; folders; writing implements; pencils
International Class 028:
Construction toys; toy construction blocks and connecting links therefor; toy figures; dolls; toy vehicles; toy animals; toy foliage; toy furniture; board games; jigsaw puzzles; play mats for use with construction toys; Christmas tree ornaments; card games; game cards; toy buildings and accessories therefor; building games; hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; cases for dolls; construction toy sets and carrying cases or storage cases sold as a unit; toy boxes; carrying cases for construction toys
As shown above in bold, the application and registration identify identical and highly similar goods in International Classes 009, 016 and 028. Where the marks of the respective parties are identical or virtually identical, as in this case, the degree of similarity or relatedness between the goods and/or services needed to support a finding of likelihood of confusion declines. See In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 116 USPQ2d 1406, 1411 (TTAB 2015) (citing In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 1207, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1689 (Fed. Cir. 1993)), aff’d, 866 F.3d 1315, 123 USPQ2d 1744 (Fed. Cir. 2017); TMEP §1207.01(a). Accordingly, the goods of applicant and the registrant in International Classes 009, 016 and 028 are considered related for purposes of the likelihood of confusion analysis.
PARTIAL-ABANDONMENT ADVISORY
For this application to proceed further, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action. If the action includes a refusal, applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. Applicant may also have other options for responding to a refusal and should consider such options carefully. To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements. For more information and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a response online, see “Responding to Office Actions” on the USPTO’s website.
If applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, the following classes will be deleted from the application: 009, 016 and 028. See 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a); TMEP §718.02(a). The application will then proceed with the following classes only: 025, 035, 041 and 044. See TMEP §718.02(a). In such case, applicant’s only option would be to file a timely petition to revive the abandoned class, which, if granted, would allow for the reinsertion of these classes into the application. See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §§718.02(a), 1714. There is a $100 fee for such petitions. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.66(b)(1).
RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION
If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
/Justin Severson/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 111
571-272-6893
justin.severson@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.