UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 79132158
MARK: ENDURA
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Endura Ltd.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NO. 1165516
The assigned examining attorney acknowledges receipt of applicant’s recent response. Through the response, applicant argues against the refusal of the mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act. The examining attorney has considered the evidence and arguments and withdraws the refusal resulting from U.S. Registration Nos. 2950218 and 3451018. However, the refusal of the mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act is maintained and continued with respect to U.S. Registration No. 4264578 for the reasons noted in the Office action dated July 20, 2013 and U.S. Registration No. 2577651 for the reasons noted in the Office action dated February 6, 2014.
In addition, applicant has proposed an amendment to the identification of goods in International Class 11, which is not acceptable for the reasons noted below. This raises a new issue.
In addition, upon further consideration of the amended identification of goods in International Classes 9 and 12, the examining attorney has determined that the wording “parts and fittings for all the aforesaid” is not acceptable for the reasons noted below. The examining attorney apologizes to applicant for any inconvenience resulting from the error in the prior office action indicating that applicant had properly amended the identification of goods in International Classes 9 and 12.
Identification of Goods-International Classes 9, 11 and 12
In an application filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), an applicant may not change the classification of goods from that assigned by the International Bureau in the corresponding international registration. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b). Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, an applicant may not transfer goods from one existing international class to another. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); see TMEP §§1402.07(a), 1904.02(c).
Therefore, any modification to this wording must identify goods in International Class 9, the classification specified in the application for these goods.
The following substitute wording is suggested, if accurate:
In an application filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), an applicant may not change the classification of goods from that assigned by the International Bureau in the corresponding international registration. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1402.01(c), 1904.02(b). The scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments is limited by the assigned international class. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(f); TMEP §§1402.07(a), 1904.02(c). If an applicant amends the identification to a class other than that assigned by the International Bureau, the amendment will not be accepted because it will exceed the scope and those goods will no longer have a basis for registration under U.S. law. TMEP §§1402.01(c), 1904.02(c). Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, an applicant may not transfer goods from one existing international class to another. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1402.01(c).
Therefore, applicant must amend this wording to identify goods in International Class 11 that are within the scope of the goods in the application as filed. See TMEP §§1402.07(a), 1904.02(c).
In the alternative, applicant may respond by deleting the unacceptable wording from the identification. See TMEP §1904.02(c)(iv). However, once an application has been expressly amended to delete goods, those items generally may not be later re-inserted. TMEP §1402.07(e).
The following substitute wording is suggested, if accurate: Lamps and lights for bicycles. (Class 11).
In an application filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), an applicant may not change the classification of goods from that assigned by the International Bureau in the corresponding international registration. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b). Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, an applicant may not transfer goods and/or services from one existing international class to another. 37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); see TMEP §§1402.07(a), 1904.02(c).
Therefore, any modification to this wording must identify goods in International Class 12, the classification specified in the application for these goods.
The following substitute wording is suggested, if accurate:
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.
Failure to Respond-Partial Refusal Abandonment Advisory
If applicant does not respond to this Office action within the six-month period for response, then the following goods will be deleted from the application:
The application will then proceed with the following goods only:
37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
Conclusion
/Linda M. Estrada/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 104
(571) 272-9298
(571) 273-9104 Fax
Linda.Estrada@USPTO.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.