RELIANCE
Chengdu Reliance Electric Co., Ltd.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79130977 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Law Office Assigned | L70 |
| Employee Name | HAN, DAWN L |
Timeline
| 2012-12-28 | Application Filed |
| 2014-01-03 | Abandon |
| 2014-02-14 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2014-02-14 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  CHENGDU RELIANCE ELECTRIC CO., LTD. |
| Address | No.66 Reliance West Road Qingyang District,; Chengdu; 610091 Sichuan CN |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CN |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 260102 | Circles, plain single line; Plain single line circles |
| 261701 | Bands, straight; Bars, straight; Lines, straight; Straight line(s), band(s) or bar(s) |
| 261704 | Bands, vertical; Bars, vertical; Lines, vertical; Vertical line(s), band(s) or bar(s) |
| 261709 | Bands, curved; Bars, curved; Curved line(s), band(s) or bar(s); Lines, curved |
| 290107 | Inconspicuous designs functioning as punctuation or parts of letters; Small, inconspicuous design elements functioning as punctuation or parts of letters |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2013-06-20 | 1 REPR M: |
| LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | 2013-06-20 | 2 LIMI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2013-06-21 | 3 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2013-06-21 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2013-06-24 | 5 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2013-06-25 | 6 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2013-07-01 | 7 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2013-07-02 | 8 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2013-07-02 | 9 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2013-07-02 | 10 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2013-07-22 | 11 RFNT P: |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2014-02-14 | 12 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2014-02-14 | 13 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2014-11-26 | 14 OPNR P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2014-11-26 | 15 OPNS P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2015-02-14 | 16 FICR P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2015-02-16 | 17 FICS P: |
| FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2015-03-06 | 18 FINT P: |
| DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | 2023-07-20 | 19 DETH P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | 2023-07-20 | 20 DENA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 