CBX
CYBEX GmbH
Application Filed: 2011-08-31
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79108598 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Peter C. Stomma |
| Attorney Docket Number | 303.032 |
| Law Office Assigned | M50 |
| Employee Name | STINE, DAVID H |
Timeline
| 2011-08-31 | Application Filed |
| 2013-11-25 | Abandon |
| 2013-11-25 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2013-11-26 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  CYBEX GmbH |
| Address | Riedinger Strasse 18 95448 Bayreuth DE |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 25 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2012-02-16 | 1 REPR M: |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2012-02-17 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2012-02-17 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-02-17 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2012-02-18 | 5 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2012-02-21 | 6 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2012-02-24 | 7 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2012-02-24 | 8 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2012-03-24 | 9 RFNP P: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2012-08-23 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-08-23 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2012-08-24 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2012-08-30 | 13 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2012-08-30 | 14 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2012-08-30 | 15 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | 2012-11-17 | 16 ADCH M: |
| TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2013-02-28 | 17 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2013-02-28 | 18 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2013-02-28 | 19 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2013-02-28 | 20 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2013-02-28 | 21 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2013-03-02 | 22 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2013-03-02 | 23 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2013-03-02 | 24 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2013-03-01 | 25 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2013-03-07 | 26 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2013-03-01 | 27 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2013-03-08 | 28 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2013-03-11 | 29 CNCF S: |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2013-03-11 | 30 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2013-03-11 | 31 GEA1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2013-05-17 | 32 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2013-06-11 | 33 CNES R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2013-06-11 | 34 GNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2013-06-11 | 35 GNSN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | 2013-07-06 | 36 RBFT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2013-07-17 | 37 OPNR P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2013-07-17 | 38 OPNS P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | 2013-08-04 | 39 OPNX P: |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2013-09-11 | 40 EXPA T:TTAB Proceeding |
| NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | 2013-10-07 | 41 GPNX P: |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2013-11-25 | 42 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2013-11-25 | 43 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2013-11-26 | 44 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | 2014-02-17 | 45 LIMG M: |
| LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | 2014-03-12 | 46 LIMN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2014-11-26 | 47 FICR P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2014-11-26 | 48 FICS P: |
| NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | 2018-03-29 | 49 NREP P: |
| DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | 2022-03-29 | 50 DETH P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | 2022-03-30 | 51 DENA E:E-Mail |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 