T2
Pi-Design AG
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79093526 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Law Office Assigned | M70 |
| Employee Name | BENMAMAN, ALICE MEDINA |
Timeline
| 2011-01-18 | Application Filed |
| 2012-04-20 | Abandon |
| 2012-05-16 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2012-05-16 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Pi-Design AG |
| Entity Statement | Société anonyme (SA); Joint Stock Company |
| Address | Kantonsstrasse 100 CH-6234 Triengen CH |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | CH |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 21 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,013,023,029,030,033,040,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0211 | Non-electric tea pots |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2011-03-03 | 1 REPR M: |
| LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | 2011-03-04 | 2 LIMI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-03-08 | 3 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2011-03-12 | 4 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2011-03-14 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2011-03-15 | 6 CNSL R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2011-03-16 | 7 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | 2011-03-16 | 8 RFWR P: |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2011-03-16 | 9 CNSL R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2011-03-17 | 10 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2011-03-17 | 11 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2011-03-17 | 12 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2011-04-03 | 13 RFNT P: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2011-09-19 | 14 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2011-09-19 | 15 RCCK S: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2011-10-19 | 16 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2011-10-19 | 17 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2012-05-16 | 18 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2012-05-16 | 19 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2012-08-25 | 20 OPNR P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2012-08-27 | 21 OPNS P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | 2012-09-14 | 22 OPNX P: |
| NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | 2012-09-28 | 23 NREP P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2013-05-16 | 24 FICR P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2013-05-16 | 25 FICS P: |
| FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2013-06-02 | 26 FINT P: |
| DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | 2021-08-07 | 27 DETH P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | 2021-08-08 | 28 DENA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 