RIVER
J. van Zoest Beheer B.V.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79064298 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Cancellation Code | H |
| Law Office Assigned | M50 |
| Employee Name | LEWIS, SHAILA E |
Timeline
| 2008-11-28 | Application Filed |
| 2009-11-12 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-11-28 | Abandon |
| 2018-11-28 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2019-06-28 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  J. van Zoest Beheer B.V. |
| Address | Reijerskoop 148 NL-2771 BT BOSKOOP NL |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | NL |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 31 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,046 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0311 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely, live plants, cut flowers, live shrubs and perennials, seeds for agricultural and horticultural purposes, living plants and natural flowers; none of the foregoing for use as fresh apples |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2009-02-12 | 1 REPR M: |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2009-02-13 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2009-02-17 | 3 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2009-02-26 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2009-02-27 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2009-02-28 | 6 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2009-03-03 | 7 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2009-03-03 | 8 RFCS P: |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2009-03-26 | 9 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2009-03-26 | 10 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-03-26 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2009-03-26 | 12 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2009-04-03 | 13 RFNT P: |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2009-04-16 | 14 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2009-04-16 | 15 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2009-11-12 | 16 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2009-11-12 | 17 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2010-07-15 | 18 OPNR P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2010-07-15 | 19 OPNS P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | 2010-07-30 | 20 OPNX P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2010-11-12 | 21 FICR P: |
| FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2010-11-12 | 22 FICS P: |
| FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2010-12-04 | 23 FINT P: |
| DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | 2019-06-27 | 24 DETH P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | 2019-06-28 | 25 DENA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 