Offc Action Outgoing

TESS

TSUNEISHI HOLDINGS CORPORATION

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:          79/049360

 

    MARK: TESS         

 

 

        

*79049360*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

          NAKAJIMA Shinsuke; c/o Sanwa Law & Paten           

          Kyobashi NS Bldg. 3F, 

          5-21, Kyobashi 2-chome

          Chuo-ku Tokyo 104-0031        

          JAPAN 

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

 

    APPLICANT:           TSUNEISHI HOLDINGS CORPORATION        

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

          N/A        

    CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

          

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE:

 

 

INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NO. 0951904.

 

This is a PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL of the trademark and/or service mark in the above-referenced U.S. application.  See 15 U.S.C. §1141h(c).

 

WHO IS PERMITTED TO RESPOND TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL:

 

Applicant may respond directly to this provisional refusal Office action, or applicant’s attorney may respond on applicant’s behalf.  However, the only attorneys who can practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in trademark matters are as follows:

 

(1)   Attorneys in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions of the U.S.; and

 

(2)   Canadian attorneys who represent applicants residing in Canada and who have applied for and received reciprocal recognition by the USPTO under 37 C.F.R. §10.14(c). 

 

37 C.F.R. §10.14; TMEP §602. 

 

Other than duly authorized Canadian attorneys, foreign attorneys cannot sign responses or otherwise represent applicants before the USPTO.  See TMEP §602.06(b).  Preparing a paper, authorizing an amendment to an application, or submitting legal arguments in response to a requirement or refusal constitutes representation of a party in a trademark matter.  A response signed by an unauthorized foreign attorney is considered an incomplete response.  TMEP §§602, 602.03, 603.04, 605.05(a).

 

THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PROVISIONALLY REFUSED AS FOLLOWS:

 

The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:

 

 

No Likelihood of Confusion

 

The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

 

Identification of Goods

 

The goods are: 

 

Class 12:  Vessels and their parts and accessories

 

The identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite.  Applicant must clarify the identification of goods by specifying the common commercial names of the specific goods intended.  TMEP §1402.01.

 

The applicant may adopt any or all of the following identification, if accurate:

 

 

Class 12:  Vessels and their STRUCTURAL parts; accessories FOR VESSELS, NAMELY, {specify Class 12 goods intended, e.g., boat cleats, boat bumpers}

 

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.

 

The international classification of goods and/or services in applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a) cannot be changed from the classification given to the goods and/or services by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in the corresponding international registration.  TMEP §§1401.03(d), 1401.04 and 1904.02(b).

 

Please note that, while the identification of goods and/or services may be amended to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, adding to the goods and/or services or broadening the scope of the goods and/or services is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods and/or services that are not within the scope of the goods and/or services set forth in the present identification.

 

 

Meaning of TESS

 

If the examining attorney is not satisfied that there is sufficient information in the record, or that he or she can secure sufficient information from sources available to him or her, to permit proper examination of the application, the examining attorney may request the applicant to furnish information.  37 C.F.R. §2.61(b).  The examining attorney has an affirmative duty to seek out information necessary for proper examination.  Bart Schwartz International Textiles, Ltd. v. Federal Trade Commission, 289 F.2d 665, 129 USPQ 258 (C.C.P.A. 1961), aff'g 121 USPQ 99 (TTAB 1959). 

 

Please state whether the letters “TESS” are an acronym and, if so, the words they represent.  Please state whether the words they represent have any significance in the relevant trade or industry or as applied to the goods.  If the words represented are not in English, please provide translations of those words.  In addition, please state whether the letters “TESS” have any other meaning.

 

 

If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.

 

 

/Katy Halmen/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 109

Phone:  (571) 272-8911

Fax:  (571) 273-8911

 

 

RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: If there are any questions about the Office action, please contact the assigned examining attorney. A response to this Office action should be filed using the form available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageD.htm. If notification of this Office action was received via e-mail, no response using this form may be filed for 72 hours after receipt of the notification. Do not attempt to respond by e-mail as the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.

 

If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response.  Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451.

 

STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) online system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.  When conducting an online status check, print and maintain a copy of the complete TARR screen.  If the status of your application has not changed for more than six months, please contact the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed