007
INTER-GLOBAL Sp. z o.o.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79034425 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Domestic Representative | Tracy L. Zawaski |
| Attorney Name | Tracy L. Zawaski |
| Attorney Docket Number | 66627-0003 |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | BROWNE, DAYNA J |
Timeline
| 2006-10-11 | Application Filed |
| 2007-12-04 | Published for Opposition |
| 2008-06-24 | Abandon |
| 2008-07-17 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2009-02-03 | Location: TTAB |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  INTER-GLOBAL Sp. z o.o. |
| Address | Stary Staw 9 PL-63-400 Ostrów Wielkopolski PL |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | PL |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | Rust removing preparations for metals |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2007-03-01 | 1 REPR M: |
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2007-03-01 | 2 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-03-01 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2007-03-08 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2007-03-09 | 5 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2007-03-13 | 6 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2007-03-13 | 7 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2007-03-29 | 8 RFNT P: |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-09-12 | 9 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-09-12 | 10 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-09-13 | 11 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-09-13 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-09-14 | 13 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-09-26 | 14 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-10-29 | 15 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-10-29 | 16 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2007-11-14 | 17 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-12-04 | 18 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2008-01-03 | 19 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | 2008-05-31 | 20 OPNC E:E-Mail |
| OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | 2008-06-02 | 21 OPNS B: |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2008-06-03 | 22 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2008-06-20 | 23 RFNP P: |
| DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | 2008-07-17 | 24 DETH P: |
| OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2009-02-03 | 25 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2009-02-03 | 26 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 