OMER

Omer S.p.a.

Application Filed: 2004-09-23

Trademark Application Details

Status

706

Live/Registered

SECTION 71 ACCEPTED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	79020226
Registration Number	3280083
Mark Drawing Code	3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s)
Domestic Representative	Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP
Attorney Name	Patrick J. Jennings
Attorney Docket Number	83437-422891
Law Office Assigned	M80
Employee Name	ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA

Timeline

2004-09-23	Application Filed
2007-05-29	Published for Opposition
2007-08-14	Trademark Registered
2016-09-22	Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE
2016-09-22	Status: Live/Registered
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	OMER S.P.A.
Address	Via Foresto, 42 I-31058 SUSEGANA ( IT
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	IT

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Design Search Codes

261302

Plain single or multiple line quadrilaterals; Quadrilaterals (single line or multiple line)

Attorney of Record

Patrick J. Jennings
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP
1200 Seventeenth Street, NW
WASHINGTON DC 20036

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	6
U.S. Codes:	002,012,013,014,023,025,050
International Codes:	7
U.S. Codes:	013,019,021,023,031,034,035
International Codes:	8
U.S. Codes:	023,028,044

Type Code	Type
CC0000	Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	2006-02-23	1 REPR M:
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2006-02-24	2 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2006-02-24	3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	2006-02-27	4 CNRT R:Renewal
NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	2006-02-28	5 RFCR E:E-Mail
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	2006-03-01	6 RFRR P:
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	2006-03-01	7 RFCS P:
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	2006-03-17	8 RFNT P:
PAPER RECEIVED	2006-08-25	9 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	2006-08-25	10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	2006-08-31	11 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	2006-09-21	12 CNFR R:Renewal
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	2006-09-22	13 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	2007-03-02	14 CNEA R:Renewal
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	2007-03-02	15 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2007-03-02	16 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED	2007-03-05	17 CNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO LIE	2007-03-28	18 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	2007-03-28	19 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	2007-05-09	20 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2007-05-29	21 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	2007-07-26	22 OPNR P:
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	2007-07-26	23 OPNS P:
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	2007-08-10	24 OPNX P:
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2007-08-14	25 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	2007-11-19	26 FICR P:
FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED	2007-12-06	27 FIMP P:
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	2007-12-07	28 FICS P:
FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	2008-12-26	29 FINO P:
NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	2010-05-20	30 NREP P:
TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED	2013-05-14	31 ES75 I:Incoming Correspondence
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	2013-06-05	32 APRE A:Allowance for Publication
REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED	2013-06-05	33 715F I:Incoming Correspondence
REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.	2013-06-05	34 C75A O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED	2013-06-05	35 NA75 E:E-Mail
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED	2014-10-09	36 RNWL P:
COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED	2016-08-14	37 REM4 E:E-Mail
TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED	2016-08-19	38 ES71 I:Incoming Correspondence
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	2016-09-22	39 APRE A:Allowance for Publication
REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED	2016-09-22	40 71AG O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED	2016-09-22	41 NA71 E:E-Mail

Similar Marks

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Company Trademark Application Date
OMER 97379458 not registered Live/Pending	Oscar G. Sanchez Claustro 2022-04-25
OMER 97379458 not registered Live/Pending	Margarita E. Sanchezaguilar 2022-04-25
OMER 90874023 not registered Live/Pending	For Kewl Peeps LLC 2021-08-10
OMER 88408777 not registered Indifferent	Peng qiuyue 0000-00-00
OMER 85397318 4243089 Dead/Cancelled	Krummholz International Inc. 2011-08-13
OMER 79065612 3669638 Live/Registered	Brouwerij Omer Vander Ghinste 2009-01-30
OMER 79020226 3280083 Live/Registered	OMER S.P.A. 2004-09-23
OMER 78179096 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Pathways Technologies, Inc. 2002-10-28
OMER 75150624 2154567 Live/Registered	Creative Competitions, Inc. 1996-08-15
OMER 73429271 1295726 Live/Registered	Officine Meccaniche Rossato S.A.S. Di Rossato Eride & C 1983-06-08

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.