Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 79018897 |
Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
Cancellation Code | H |
Law Office Assigned | M10 |
Employee Name | CAPSHAW, DANIEL |
2005-10-20 | Application Filed |
2007-07-02 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2015-10-20 | Abandon |
2015-10-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | NT-ware Systemprogrammierungs GmbH |
Entity Statement | Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung |
Address | Schloà Str. 12 49186 Bad Iburg DE |
Legal Entity Type | |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Optical, measuring, signaling and checking apparatus and instruments, namely, devices for use in identifying and recognizing users of printing or copying devices; data processing equipment, namely, a hardware box that can be connected, directly or via a network, to a printing or copying device or a user identification device, for import and processing of user-specific print or copy data and/or charges; computer software for printer and copier management, namely, for compiling and accounting print and copy charges and for automating and optimizing print workflow. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2006-01-05 | 1 REPR M: |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-01-06 | 2 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-04-24 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-04-28 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2006-04-28 | 5 RFCR E:E-Mail |
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2006-05-01 | 6 RFRR P: |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2006-05-01 | 7 RFCS P: |
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2006-05-18 | 8 RFNT P: |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-10-31 | 9 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-10-31 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-11-01 | 11 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-11-21 | 12 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2006-11-21 | 13 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2007-06-07 | 14 OPNR P: |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2007-06-07 | 15 OPNS P: |
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | 2007-06-22 | 16 OPNX P: |
ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2007-07-02 | 17 ABN0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2007-07-02 | 18 MAB0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2008-07-03 | 19 FICR P: |
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | 2008-07-03 | 20 FICS P: |
FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | 2008-08-07 | 21 FINT P: |
DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | 2016-05-19 | 22 DETH P: |
NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | 2016-05-20 | 23 DENA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.