POWERED BY THE CONCEPT OF ONE
AT&T Corp.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78976502 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Frank L. Politano |
| Attorney Docket Number | FLP/CMA/LABS |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | BLAIR, JASON PAUL |
Timeline
| 2005-05-18 | Application Filed |
| 2005-08-02 | Date of First Use |
| 2006-06-19 | Abandon |
| 2006-07-27 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2006-07-27 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  AT&T Corp. |
| Address | 32 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 10013 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 35 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| International Codes: | 38 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,104 |
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0351 | TECHNOLOGY INCUBATION SERVICES, NAMELY, BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE AREAS OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION, PLANNING AND STRATEGIC MARKETING OF TECHNOLOGY, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SERVICES, NAMELY THE LICENSING AND WHOLESALE TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY RELATING TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTS, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS, PRODUCTS FOR SPEECH PROCESSING AND SPEECH SYNTHESIS, COMPUTERS, PRODUCTS FOR USE IN BUILDING, DEVELOPING AND OPERATING GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK SOFTWARE |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-05-26 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-08-23 | 2 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-08-23 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-10-27 | 4 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2005-08-23 | 5 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2005-11-01 | 6 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2005-08-23 | 7 IUAF S: |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2005-10-27 | 8 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-12-13 | 9 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-12-16 | 10 CNRT R:Renewal |
| USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 2005-12-16 | 11 IUAA P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-12-16 | 12 GNRT F:First Action |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2006-07-27 | 13 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2006-07-27 | 14 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 POWERED BY THE CONCEPT OF ONE 78976502 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
AT&T Corp. 2005-05-18 |
 POWERED BY THE CONCEPT OF ONE 78898092 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
AT&T Corp. 2006-06-01 |
 POWERED BY THE CONCEPT OF ONE 78632166 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
AT&T Corp. 2005-05-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 