Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78976088 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Frank M.Weyer, James M. Slominski, Todd N. Snyder, Cathe |
Law Office Assigned | L70 |
Employee Name | ALTREE, NICHOLAS |
2004-04-16 | Application Filed |
2006-10-09 | Abandon |
2006-10-09 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2006-10-09 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 1661 North Lincoln Boulevard Suite 220 Los Angeles CA 90404 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | CA |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 28 |
U.S. Codes: | 022,023,038,050 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0281 | Toys, namely, action figures and accessories therefor, mechanical action toys, electric action toys, battery operated action toys, wind-up toys, talking toys, and toy figures |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-04-23 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-05-07 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2004-10-11 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2004-10-12 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2005-03-18 | 5 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2005-03-18 | 6 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-03-23 | 7 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-04-14 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-04-15 | 9 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2005-04-21 | 10 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2005-04-27 | 11 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2005-04-27 | 12 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2005-04-14 | 13 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2005-05-06 | 14 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2005-07-29 | 15 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2005-08-01 | 16 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-02-02 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2006-02-13 | 18 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2006-02-13 | 19 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-02-02 | 20 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-02-16 | 21 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2006-03-08 | 22 CNCF S: |
ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | 2006-03-08 | 23 RECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL DSMSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | 2006-08-28 | 24 EXFB T:TTAB Proceeding |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2006-10-09 | 25 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2006-10-09 | 26 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2006-10-10 | 27 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.