ITU Unit Action

PETER PAN

CONAGRA FOODS RDM, INC.

ITU Unit Action

Trademark Snap Shot ITU Unit Action (Table presents the data on ITU Unit Action)
OVERVIEW
SERIAL NUMBER	78962450	FILING DATE	08/29/2006
REG NUMBER	0000000	REG DATE	N/A
REGISTER	PRINCIPAL	MARK TYPE	TRADEMARK
INTL REG #	N/A	INTL REG DATE	N/A
TM ATTORNEY	STOIDES, KATHERINE	L.O. ASSIGNED	101

PUB INFORMATION
RUN DATE	06/10/2014
PUB DATE	09/07/2010
STATUS	606-ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED
STATUS DATE	06/09/2014
LITERAL MARK ELEMENT	PETER PAN

DATE ABANDONED	06/09/2014	DATE CANCELLED	N/A
SECTION 2F	NO	SECTION 2F IN PART	NO
SECTION 8	NO	SECTION 8 IN PART	NO
SECTION 15	NO	REPUB 12C	N/A
RENEWAL FILED	NO	RENEWAL DATE	N/A
DATE AMEND REG	N/A

FILING BASIS
FILED BASIS		CURRENT BASIS		AMENDED BASIS
1 (a)	NO	1 (a)	NO	1 (a)	NO
1 (b)	YES	1 (b)	YES	1 (b)	NO
44D	NO	44D	NO	44D	NO
44E	NO	44E	NO	44E	NO
66A	NO	66A	NO
NO BASIS	NO	NO BASIS	NO

MARK DATA
STANDARD CHARACTER MARK	YES
LITERAL MARK ELEMENT	PETER PAN
MARK DRAWING CODE	4-STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
COLOR DRAWING FLAG	NO

CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION
PARTY TYPE	20-OWNER AT PUBLICATION
NAME	CONAGRA FOODS RDM, INC.
ADDRESS	ONE CONAGRA DRIVE OMAHA, NE 68102
ENTITY	03-CORPORATION
CITIZENSHIP	Delaware

GOODS AND SERVICES
INTERNATIONAL CLASS	030
DESCRIPTION TEXT	crackers

GOODS AND SERVICES CLASSIFICATION
INTERNATIONAL CLASS	030	FIRST USE DATE	NONE	FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE	NONE	CLASS STATUS	6-ACTIVE

MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION/STATEMENTS
CHANGE IN REGISTRATION	NO
OWNER OF US REG NOS	0217759 0889444 2044847

PROSECUTION HISTORY
DATE	ENT CD	ENT TYPE	DESCRIPTION	ENT NUM
06/09/2014	MAB6	O	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	056
06/09/2014	ABN6	S	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	055
02/27/2014	TCCA	I	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	054
11/06/2013	EXRA	E	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	053
11/05/2013	EX5G	S	EXTENSION 5 GRANTED	052
10/25/2013	EXT5	S	EXTENSION 5 FILED	051
10/25/2013	EEXT	I	TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	050
05/30/2013	EXRA	E	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	049
05/29/2013	EX4G	S	EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	048
05/03/2013	EXT4	S	EXTENSION 4 FILED	047
05/24/2013	AITU	A	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	046
05/03/2013	EEXT	I	TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	045
11/07/2012	EXRA	E	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	044
11/06/2012	EX3G	S	EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	043
11/02/2012	EXT3	S	EXTENSION 3 FILED	042
11/02/2012	EEXT	I	TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	041
05/24/2012	EXRA	E	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	040
05/23/2012	EX2G	S	EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	039
05/02/2012	EXT2	S	EXTENSION 2 FILED	038
05/23/2012	AITU	A	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	037
05/02/2012	EEXT	I	TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	036
11/04/2011	EXRA	E	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	035
11/02/2011	EX1G	S	EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	034
11/02/2011	EXT1	S	EXTENSION 1 FILED	033
11/02/2011	EEXT	I	TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	032
05/03/2011	NOAM	E	NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	031
03/22/2011	ETOP	T	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED	030
09/28/2010	ETOF	T	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	029
09/07/2010	NPUB	E	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	028
09/07/2010	PUBO	A	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	027
07/31/2010	PREV	O	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	026
07/31/2010	CNSA	P	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	025
07/29/2010	TEME	I	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	024
07/29/2010	CRFA	I	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	023
07/29/2010	TROA	I	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	022
01/31/2010	GNRN	O	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	021
01/31/2010	GNRT	O	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	020
01/31/2010	CNRT	R	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	019
01/11/2010	RCCK	S	LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION	018
01/08/2010	ALIE	A	ASSIGNED TO LIE	017
01/07/2010	ALIE	A	ASSIGNED TO LIE	016
07/07/2009	RCSC	S	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	015
01/05/2009	RCSC	S	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	014
10/02/2008	ARAA	I	ATTORNEY REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	013
10/02/2008	REAP	I	TEAS REVOKE/APPOINT ATTORNEY RECEIVED	012
07/03/2008	RCSC	S	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	011
01/02/2008	RCSC	S	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	010
09/12/2007	ASGN	I	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	009
06/28/2007	RCSC	S	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	008
06/28/2007	ALIE	A	ASSIGNED TO LIE	007
12/26/2006	GNSL	F	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	006
12/26/2006	CNSL	R	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	005
12/23/2006	DOCK	D	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	004
09/18/2006	ARAA	I	ATTORNEY REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	003
09/18/2006	REAP	I	TEAS REVOKE/APPOINT ATTORNEY RECEIVED	002
09/05/2006	NWAP	I	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	001

CURRENT CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION
ATTORNEY	Christopher M. Bikus
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS	Christopher M. Bikus Husch Blackwell LLP 13330 California Street, Suite 200 Omaha NE 68154
DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE	NONE

PRIOR OWNER INFORMATION
PARTY TYPE	11-SUBSEQUENT OWNER BEFORE PUBLICATION
NAME	CONAGRA FOODS RDM, INC.
ADDRESS	ONE CONAGRA DRIVE OMAHA, NE 68102
ENTITY	03-CORPORATION
CITIZENSHIP	Delaware
PARTY TYPE	10-ORIGINAL APPLICANT
NAME	ConAgra Brands, Inc.
ADDRESS	One ConAgra Drive Omaha, NE 68102
ENTITY	03-CORPORATION
CITIZENSHIP	Nebraska

ITU Unit Action [image/jpeg]

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.