Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78931836 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Matthew A. Powelson |
Attorney Docket Number | LGT1547 |
Law Office Assigned | L60 |
Employee Name | DALIER, JOHN DAVID |
2005-12-31 | Date of First Use |
2006-07-18 | Application Filed |
2009-01-20 | Amend to Register |
2009-10-18 | Abandon |
2009-11-13 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2009-11-13 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 7251 Lake Mead Blvd, West, 3rd Floor Las Vegas NV 89128 |
Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
Legal Entity State | NV |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 41 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0411 | Educational services and education of individuals in the field of sound recordings and reproduction |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-07-21 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-11-06 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-11-13 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2006-11-14 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-05-14 | 5 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-05-14 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-05-15 | 7 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2007-05-17 | 8 CNSL R:Renewal |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2007-05-17 | 9 CNSL S: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-11-21 | 10 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-11-21 | 11 RCSC S: |
LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2008-05-21 | 12 RCCK S: |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2008-07-22 | 13 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2008-07-22 | 14 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2009-01-20 | 15 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2009-01-20 | 16 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2009-01-20 | 17 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2009-01-20 | 18 EAAU I:Incoming Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2009-01-21 | 19 IUAF S: |
AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2009-01-21 | 20 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2009-01-20 | 21 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-01-27 | 22 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2009-01-27 | 23 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2009-04-17 | 24 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2009-04-17 | 25 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2009-11-13 | 26 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2009-11-13 | 27 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2009-11-13 | 28 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.