KALEIDOSCOPE
Kaleidoscope Marketing Group, LLC
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78904845 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | W. Andrew Gowder, Jr. |
| Law Office Assigned | M20 |
| Employee Name | EULIN, INGRID C |
Timeline
| 1999-01-01 | Date of First Use |
| 2006-06-09 | Application Filed |
| 2008-07-18 | Abandon |
| 2008-08-14 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2008-08-14 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Kaleidoscope Marketing Group, LLC |
| Address | 710 Johnnie Dodds Blvd., Suite 300 Mt. Pleasant SC 29464 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | SC |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 020133 | Grotesque men formed by letters, numbers, punctuation or geometric shapes; Stick figures |
| 160125 | Alarms, fire; Bullhorns; Burglar alarms; Fire alarms; Handset; Intercoms; Megaphones; Pagers; Smoke detectors |
| 260102 | Circles, plain single line; Plain single line circles |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 41 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The color(s) red, black, and white is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-06-14 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2006-06-15 | 2 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-11-09 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-11-09 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2006-11-09 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2007-05-07 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-05-24 | 7 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-05-24 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-05-24 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2007-06-14 | 10 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2007-06-14 | 11 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2007-06-14 | 12 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2007-12-14 | 13 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-12-20 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2007-12-20 | 15 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | 2008-01-16 | 16 CNCF R:Renewal |
| CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2008-01-16 | 17 GNCF O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | 2008-01-16 | 18 GNS1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2008-08-14 | 19 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2008-08-15 | 20 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | 2008-09-03 | 21 UNDN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 