Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 78849099 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Scott W. Kelley |
Attorney Docket Number | NAVAR-48751 |
Law Office Assigned | L40 |
Employee Name | RIRIE, VERNA BETH |
2006-03-29 | Application Filed |
2009-07-14 | Published for Opposition |
2009-10-06 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
2010-05-10 | Abandon |
2010-05-10 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Navarrete, Danny |
Address | #306 1310 N. Detroit Street Los Angeles CA US 90046 |
Legal Entity Type | Individual |
Legal Entity State | US |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 3 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0031 | Blush; Body powder; Concealers for face and eyes; Cosmetic pencils; Eye cream; Eye liner; Eye make-up; Eye make-up remover; Eye pencils; Eye shadow; Eye shadows; Eyeliner pencils; Face and body creams; Face and body lotions; Facial beauty masks; Facial cleansers; Facial make-up; Facial scrubs; Hair conditioners; Lip liner; Lipsticks; Make up foundations; Make-up powder; Make-up remover; Mascara; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Rouges; Shampoos; Skin cleansers; Skin moisturizer; Skin toners |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-04-04 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | 2006-04-11 | 2 MPMK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-09-12 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2006-09-18 | 4 CNSL R:Renewal |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2006-09-18 | 5 GNSL F:First Action |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-04-06 | 6 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-04-06 | 7 RCSC S: |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-06-12 | 8 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-10-09 | 9 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-04-10 | 10 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-10-10 | 11 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2009-04-10 | 12 RCSC S: |
TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | 2009-06-04 | 13 ERSI I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2009-06-04 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2009-06-04 | 15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-06-06 | 16 CNSA P: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2009-06-10 | 17 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2009-06-11 | 18 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2009-06-24 | 19 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2009-07-14 | 20 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2009-10-06 | 21 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2010-05-10 | 22 ABN6 S: |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2010-05-10 | 23 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.