RINGO
Richard Starkey aka Ringo Starr
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78821116 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Stephen J. Strauss |
| Attorney Docket Number | RICHS 73250 |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | DEFORD, JEFFREY S |
Timeline
| 2006-02-22 | Application Filed |
| 2009-04-14 | Abandon |
| 2009-04-14 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2009-04-20 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Richard Starkey aka Ringo Starr |
| Address | c/o Bruce V. Grakal, Esq., 1541 Ocean Bo ulevard, Suite 200; Santa Monica CA GB 90401 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
| Legal Entity State | GB |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 25 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0251 | CLOTHING, NAMELY SWEATSHIRTS AND SWEATPANTS, SHORTS, TOPS, T-SHIRTS, SPORT SHIRTS, SHIRTS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, JACKETS, BELTS AND SOCKS;HEADGEAR, NAMELY, HEADBANDS, HATS, CAPS AND BEANIES; AND FOOTWEAR, ALL DEPICTING THE NAME AND IMAGE OF A FAMOUS ENTERTAINER |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2006-03-01 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2006-06-29 | 2 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION - ENTERED | 2006-06-29 | 3 AMPX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-07-21 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2006-07-24 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-09-11 | 6 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-09-11 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-10-13 | 8 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-11-14 | 9 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2006-11-15 | 10 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2007-05-15 | 11 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2007-05-15 | 12 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2007-11-23 | 13 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2008-01-23 | 14 CNES R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | 2008-01-23 | 15 CNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2008-09-02 | 16 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-09-10 | 17 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-09-10 | 18 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2008-09-10 | 19 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2009-01-27 | 20 EXPA T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2009-04-13 | 21 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2009-04-14 | 22 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2009-04-20 | 23 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 