KITCHENMATE
Smith & Doyle Inc.
Application Filed: 2005-11-03
Trademark Application Details
CANCELLED - SECTION 8
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78746137 |
| Registration Number | 3604403 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | Wayne A. Sivertson |
| Attorney Name | Richard C. Stempkovski, Jr. |
| Attorney Docket Number | S4046.602101 |
| Law Office Assigned | L20 |
| Employee Name | SAITO, KIM TSUKIYO |
Timeline
| 2005-11-03 | Application Filed |
| 2006-09-29 | Date of First Use |
| 2007-02-27 | Published for Opposition |
| 2009-04-07 | Trademark Registered |
| 2014-12-10 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 |
| 2019-11-08 | Cancelled |
| 2019-11-08 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2019-12-17 | Transaction Date |
| 2019-12-18 | Published for Opposition |
| 2019-12-18 | Trademark Registered |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Smith & Doyle Inc. |
| Address | 55 Airport Road Winnipeg, Manitoba CA R3H 0V5 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 050525 | Daffodils; Iris (flower); Other flowers |
| 051307 | Containers of flowers; Flower pots, With plants or flowers; Plant stands containing vegetation; Pots, flower, containing plants; Urns, filled with flowers; Vases, filled with plants/flowers |
| 260101 | Circles as carriers or as single line borders |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 8 |
| U.S. Codes: | 023,028,044 |
| International Codes: | 21 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,013,023,029,030,033,040,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-11-08 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2005-11-09 | 2 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-04-13 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-04-24 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2006-04-24 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-10-25 | 6 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-10-25 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-11-16 | 8 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | 2006-11-17 | 9 CPEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2006-11-17 | 10 GEAP O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-11-29 | 11 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-01-03 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2007-01-06 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2007-01-06 | 14 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-01-08 | 15 CNSA P: |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-01-09 | 16 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2007-02-07 | 17 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-02-27 | 18 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2007-03-28 | 19 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | 2007-07-13 | 20 ETOP T:TTAB Proceeding |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2007-08-28 | 21 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2008-02-25 | 22 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2008-02-25 | 23 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2008-03-19 | 24 EX1G S: |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2008-08-22 | 25 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2008-09-03 | 26 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2008-08-22 | 27 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2008-09-03 | 28 EX2G S: |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2009-02-20 | 29 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2009-02-20 | 30 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2009-02-23 | 31 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2009-02-26 | 32 CNPR P: |
| LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2009-02-27 | 33 REGV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2009-04-07 | 34 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2014-11-20 | 35 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2014-12-10 | 36 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2014-12-10 | 37 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | 2014-12-10 | 38 NA85 E:E-Mail |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2018-04-07 | 39 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2019-01-16 | 40 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2019-01-16 | 41 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2019-11-08 | 42 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 