Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78706921 |
Registration Number | 3210492 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Attorney Name | Monica Riva Talley |
Attorney Docket Number | 09161.0005 |
Law Office Assigned | L70 |
Employee Name | SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHA |
2005-09-06 | Application Filed |
2006-02-03 | Date of First Use |
2006-12-05 | Published for Opposition |
2007-02-20 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
2007-02-20 | Trademark Registered |
2013-09-27 | Cancelled |
2013-09-27 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | P.O. Box 6150 McLean VA US 22106 |
Legal Entity Type | Individual |
Legal Entity State | US |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 0 |
U.S. Codes: | B |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CS0000 | The certification mark, as used by persons authorized by the certifier, certifies that the persons have met certain educational and experiential criteria, have passed the requisite examinations in the protocol and etiquette field, and adhere to ethical standards established by the certifier. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-09-12 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2005-09-30 | 2 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2005-09-30 | 3 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2005-10-21 | 4 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-10-21 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-11-02 | 6 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2006-02-17 | 7 EAAU I:Incoming Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2006-02-17 | 8 IUAF S: |
AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2006-03-01 | 9 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-03-19 | 10 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | 2006-03-28 | 11 AAUD F:First Action |
REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | 2006-03-28 | 12 RFTP Z:Deletion |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-03-28 | 13 CNRT R:Renewal |
DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | 2006-03-28 | 14 GNRU F:First Action |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-06-29 | 15 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-06-29 | 16 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-07-12 | 17 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 2006-10-03 | 18 IUAA P: |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2006-10-03 | 19 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2006-10-06 | 20 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2006-10-13 | 21 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2006-11-15 | 22 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2006-12-05 | 23 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2007-02-20 | 24 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2013-09-27 | 25 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.