CEDAR RIDGE
Semco Distributing, Inc.
Mark For: CEDAR RIDGE™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78695153 |
| Mark Literal Elements | CEDAR RIDGE |
| Mark Drawing Type | 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK |
| Mark Type | Trademark |
| Current Location | TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2006-10-04 |
| Basis | 1(b) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | No |
| Current Use | No |
| Intent To Use | Yes |
| Filed ITU | Yes |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Attorney Name | Kurt R. Klaus |
| Attorney Docket Number | Moore - SEMC |
| Law Office Assigned | M50 |
| Employee Name | FIRST, VIVIAN M |
Timeline
| 2005-08-18 | Application Filed |
| 2005-10-12 | Date of First Use |
| 2005-10-12 | Date of Use In Commerce |
| 2006-09-09 | Abandon |
| 2006-10-04 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2006-10-04 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
| 2006-10-04 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  SEMCO DISTRIBUTING, INC. |
| Address | 50 Robinson Industrial Drive Perryville, MISSOURI UNITED STATES 63775 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | MISSOURI |
Documents
 Application | 2005-08-18 | |
| Drawing | 2005-08-18 | |
| Change of Address | 2005-12-12 | |
| Amendment to Allege Use | 2006-01-30 | |
| Specimen | 2006-01-30 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2006-03-08 | |
| XSearch Search Summary | 2006-03-08 | |
| Change of Address | 2006-08-02 | |
| Notice of Abandonment | 2006-10-04 | |
| Change of Address | 2007-04-02 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 19 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,012,033,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0191 | Stone for building and construction in the nature of flagstones, footing stones, flooring, steppers, steps, mantels, walls, edging, caps and coping, decorative gravel, sand, dry cast patio blocks, boulders and ledge rock, cobblers, natural walls, drywall, paving stones, cut rock, tumbled rock, and sawed rock |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2007-04-02 | |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2006-10-04 | |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2006-10-04 | |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2006-08-02 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-03-08 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2006-03-08 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-03-07 | |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-02-13 | |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2006-02-13 | |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2006-01-30 | |
| TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2006-01-30 | |
| PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | 2006-01-30 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-01-30 | |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2005-12-12 | |
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | 2005-08-26 |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 