TAXI
Escobar, Francisco
The mark consists of The mark consists of yellow-orange (as this is one color mixed together) and red as applied to a taxicab, with a red and yellow checker stripe on both sides of the vehicle. The color yellow-orange appears on the body of the taxicab, including forth and back portions, with the exeption of the quarter panels, all four quarter panels are red. The dotted lines shown on the drawing are not part of the mark, but are only used to show position of the mark. This mark will be used on any model vehicle fit for taxicab use.
Mark For: TAXI™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78688212 |
| Mark Literal Elements | TAXI |
| Mark Drawing Type | 3 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WHICH INCLUDES WORD(S)/ LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
| Mark Type | Service Mark |
| Standard Character Claim | No |
| Current Location | TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2006-10-13 |
| Basis | 1(a) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | Yes |
| Current Use | Yes |
| Intent To Use | No |
| Filed ITU | No |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Law Office Assigned | L80 |
| Employee Name | GEORGE, DAHLIA AMELIA |
Timeline
| 2004-06-01 | Date of First Use |
| 2005-03-03 | Date of Use In Commerce |
| 2005-08-09 | Application Filed |
| 2006-09-11 | Abandon |
| 2006-10-13 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2006-10-13 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
| 2006-10-13 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2019-06-18 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  Escobar, Francisco |
| Address | 258 Arch St. San Francisco, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 94132 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
Documents
 Drawing | 2005-08-09 | |
| Specimen | 2005-08-09 | |
| TEAS Plus New Application | 2005-08-09 | |
| XSearch Search Summary | 2006-03-08 | |
| Notation to File | 2006-03-09 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2006-03-09 | |
| Notice of Abandonment | 2006-10-16 |
Design Search Codes
| 25.03.01 | Checker board pattern; Checkerboard patterns |
| 26.17.03 | Dotted line(s); Lines, dotted |
| 180501 | Cabs, taxi; Cars (not emergency); Hearses; Limousines; Race cars; Taxicabs |
| 250301 | Checker board pattern; Checkerboard patterns |
| 261703 | Dotted line(s); Lines, dotted |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 39 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,105 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The applicant claims color as a feature of the mark, namely, yellow-orange and red, with red and yellow checker stripe. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2006-10-16 | |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2006-10-13 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-03-09 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2006-03-09 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-02-28 | |
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | 2005-08-15 |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 