PHD
Farouk Systems, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78664141 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Mark G. Chretien |
| Attorney Docket Number | 029358.05 |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | HETZEL, DANNEAN |
Timeline
| 2005-07-05 | Application Filed |
| 2007-01-16 | Published for Opposition |
| 2007-11-14 | Abandon |
| 2007-11-14 | Location: TTAB |
| 2007-11-14 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Farouk Systems, Inc. |
| Address | Suite 150 250 Pennbright Houston TX 77090 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | TX |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | Hair care products, namely shampoo, conditioner, hair coloring preparations, hair color lighteners, permanent wave lotions, hair color brighteners, mousse, gel, color lock treatments, color developers, thermal hair protective treatments and hair sprays |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-07-11 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-01-24 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2006-01-26 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2006-01-27 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-07-27 | 5 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-07-27 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-08-04 | 7 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2006-08-08 | 8 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2006-08-08 | 9 CNSL S: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-11-06 | 10 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2006-11-29 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-11-29 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-11-29 | 13 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2006-11-30 | 14 CNSA P: |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2006-12-01 | 15 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2006-12-27 | 16 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-01-16 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2007-02-15 | 18 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2007-05-16 | 19 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2007-06-25 | 20 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2007-11-14 | 21 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2007-11-14 | 22 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | 2007-11-14 | 23 MAB4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 