Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 78627613 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Law Office Assigned | M40 |
Employee Name | FRYE, KIMBERLY |
2005-05-11 | Application Filed |
2006-04-11 | Published for Opposition |
2006-10-15 | Date of First Use |
2007-09-19 | Abandon |
2007-10-26 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2007-10-26 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Mongeli, Adrian G. |
Address | 6611 Sedan Avenue West Hills CA US 91307 |
Legal Entity Type | Individual |
Legal Entity State | US |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
International Codes: | 15 |
U.S. Codes: | 002,021,036 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Audio electronic equipment for professional and consumer use, namely, digital signal processors, vocal and musical instrument effects processors, musical instrument amplifiers, audio mixers, audio monitors for the reproduction of sound, audio speakers; computer software and computer ports for recording, editing, managing, mixing, and play-back of analog and digital audio; and related accessories, namely power cords |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-05-17 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-12-08 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | 2005-12-14 | 3 CPEA R:Renewal |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-12-14 | 4 GEAP F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-01-25 | 5 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-01-25 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-02-10 | 7 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2006-02-15 | 8 CNEA R:Renewal |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2006-02-15 | 9 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2006-02-15 | 10 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2006-02-15 | 11 CNSA P: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2006-02-17 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2006-02-23 | 13 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2006-03-22 | 14 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2006-04-11 | 15 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-06-19 | 16 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2006-07-04 | 17 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2006-12-29 | 18 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2006-12-29 | 19 IUAF S: |
STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2007-03-17 | 20 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | 2007-03-19 | 21 CNRT W: |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2007-03-19 | 22 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2007-10-26 | 23 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2007-10-26 | 24 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.