Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 78601520 |
Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
Attorney Name | Darin Frank |
Law Office Assigned | M10 |
Employee Name | KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE |
2005-04-04 | Application Filed |
2006-07-11 | Published for Opposition |
2007-04-04 | Abandon |
2007-10-26 | Location: PETITIONS OFFICE |
2007-10-26 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Interlace, LLC |
Address | 1135 N. Mansfield Los Angeles CA 90038 |
Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
Legal Entity State | CA |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
260103 | Circles, incomplete (more than semi |
260121 | Circles that are totally or partially shaded. |
261121 | Rectangles that are completely or partially shaded |
International Codes: | 35 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
International Codes: | 41 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CC0000 | The color(s) black and silver is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-04-11 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-10-31 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2005-11-10 | 3 CNEA R:Renewal |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2005-11-10 | 4 GNEA F:First Action |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2005-11-15 | 5 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-11-29 | 6 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-11-29 | 7 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-12-26 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-12-26 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-01-04 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-03-14 | 11 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2006-03-14 | 12 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2006-05-18 | 13 CNSA P: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2006-05-19 | 14 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2006-05-25 | 15 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2006-06-21 | 16 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2006-07-11 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | 2006-07-19 | 18 UNDN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2006-08-01 | 19 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2006-08-11 | 20 CORV P: |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2006-10-03 | 21 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2007-06-21 | 22 ABN6 S: |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2007-06-21 | 23 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2007-08-30 | 24 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2007-08-30 | 25 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | 2007-09-23 | 26 APET A:Allowance for Publication |
PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | 2007-10-09 | 27 PETD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.