SPC
Spc Co., Ltd.
Application Filed: 2005-03-30
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED - NO STATEMENT OF USE FILED
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78597790 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | James H. Walters |
| Attorney Docket Number | I-218 |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ |
Timeline
| 2005-03-30 | Application Filed |
| 2010-03-23 | Published for Opposition |
| 2011-05-27 | Location: DIVISIONAL UNIT |
| 2012-06-18 | Abandon |
| 2012-06-18 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  SPC CO., LTD. |
| Address | 149-3, Sangdaewon-dong, Jungwon-gu, Seon Gyeonggi-do KR 462-807 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | KR |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 050308 | More than one leaf, including scattered leaves, bunches of leaves not attached to branches |
| 050325 | Leaf, single; Other leaves |
| 260921 | Squares that are completely or partially shaded |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 35 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The color(s) blue, white, red, orange and green is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-04-05 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-10-26 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-11-10 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2005-11-14 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2006-05-15 | 5 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-05-15 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-05-15 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-05-31 | 8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2006-06-26 | 9 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2006-06-27 | 10 CNSL S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-12-27 | 11 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-06-27 | 12 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-12-27 | 13 RCSC S: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-06-27 | 14 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-06-27 | 15 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-12-29 | 16 RCSC S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2009-06-29 | 17 RCCK S: |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2009-08-04 | 18 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2009-08-05 | 19 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2010-02-05 | 20 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2010-02-05 | 21 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2010-02-05 | 22 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2010-02-04 | 23 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2010-02-10 | 24 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2010-02-10 | 25 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2010-02-12 | 26 CNSA P: |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2010-02-18 | 27 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2010-03-03 | 28 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2010-03-23 | 29 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2010-05-18 | 30 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2010-11-04 | 31 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2010-11-04 | 32 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2010-11-04 | 33 EX1G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | 2010-11-06 | 34 EXRA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2011-05-12 | 35 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2011-05-12 | 36 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2011-05-17 | 37 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2011-05-12 | 38 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2011-05-27 | 39 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2011-05-12 | 40 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2011-05-27 | 41 EX2G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | 2011-05-28 | 42 EXRA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRECTED NOA MAILED | 2011-06-01 | 43 NOAC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2011-11-08 | 44 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2011-11-08 | 45 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2011-11-10 | 46 EX3G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | 2011-11-11 | 47 EXRA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2012-06-18 | 48 ABN6 S: |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2012-06-18 | 49 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 