HEXCEL
SmartSlab Ltd
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78590850 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Yolanda M. Price |
| Attorney Docket Number | 12746 |
| Law Office Assigned | M80 |
| Employee Name | TANNER, MICHAEL R |
Timeline
| 2005-03-18 | Application Filed |
| 2007-01-11 | Abandon |
| 2007-02-13 | Published for Opposition |
| 2007-03-02 | Location: OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL |
| 2007-03-02 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  SmartSlab Ltd |
| Entity Statement | LIMITED COMPANY |
| Address | 42A Charlotte Street London GB W1T 2NP GB2 |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | GB |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| International Codes: | 11 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,021,023,031,034 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Digital video display units, namely, digital video monitors, digital video television monitors, digital video computer monitors, digital video LCD panels; television display screens; video screens; digital screens, namely, digital computer display screens, digital television display screens, digital projection screens, digital flat panel display screens |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-03-24 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-10-11 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-10-11 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | 2005-10-19 | 4 CPEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-10-19 | 5 GEAP F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-04-19 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-04-19 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-05-05 | 8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-05-22 | 9 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2006-05-22 | 10 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-11-21 | 11 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2006-12-18 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-12-18 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-12-18 | 14 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2006-12-19 | 15 CNSA P: |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2007-01-03 | 16 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | 2007-01-11 | 17 EXAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2007-01-24 | 18 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2007-02-13 | 19 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2007-03-02 | 20 CORV P: |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | 2007-03-02 | 21 ABN5 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 