VINTAGE
Gowan - Comercio Internacional E Servicos Lda
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78576629 |
| Registration Number | 3116504 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Gavin J. Milczarek-Desai |
| Attorney Docket Number | 121895.00021 |
| Law Office Assigned | L90 |
| Employee Name | RAUEN, JAMES A |
Timeline
| 2005-02-09 | Date of First Use |
| 2005-02-28 | Application Filed |
| 2005-11-08 | Published for Opposition |
| 2006-07-18 | Trademark Registered |
| 2012-06-09 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 |
| 2017-02-24 | Cancelled |
| 2017-02-24 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  GOWAN - COMERCIO INTERNACIONAL E SERVICOS LDA |
| Address | RUA IVENS NO. 3 B DONA MECIA BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR 9000-046 FUNCHAL, PT |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | PT |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 5 |
| U.S. Codes: | 006,018,044,046,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0051 | fungicides for non-ornamental plants, namely, grapes, pears, apples and cherries |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-03-07 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-09-21 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2005-09-21 | 3 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2005-09-23 | 4 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2005-09-27 | 5 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2005-10-19 | 6 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2005-11-08 | 7 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2005-12-07 | 8 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-05-04 | 9 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | 2006-05-08 | 10 ATRQ I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | 2006-05-09 | 11 ATRV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | 2006-06-01 | 12 ETOP T:TTAB Proceeding |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2006-07-18 | 13 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2012-05-31 | 14 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2012-06-09 | 15 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2012-06-09 | 16 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | 2012-06-09 | 17 NA85 E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2013-12-11 | 18 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2015-04-29 | 19 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2015-07-18 | 20 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2017-02-24 | 21 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 