Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78572632 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Frank J. Martinez, Esq. |
Attorney Docket Number | 1016-4 |
Law Office Assigned | M10 |
Employee Name | PERKINS, ELLEN J |
2005-02-22 | Application Filed |
2005-03-05 | Date of First Use |
2009-02-10 | Abandon |
2009-03-05 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2009-03-05 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 55 Poplar Street, Suite 4-K Brooklyn NY 112016930 |
Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
Legal Entity State | NY |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 3 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0031 | Cosmetics, namely, bath and body oils, cosmetic creams, facial and skin cleaners, body and facial scrubs, shaving and after shaving balms, bath salts, milk-type bath preparations, soaps and perfumes |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-03-03 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-05-18 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-07-08 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-07-08 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2005-09-07 | 5 EAAU I:Incoming Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2005-09-07 | 6 IUAF S: |
AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2005-09-21 | 7 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-09-07 | 8 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-09-21 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 2005-09-29 | 10 IUAA P: |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-01-03 | 11 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-01-03 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-01-23 | 13 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2006-01-23 | 14 CNSL R:Renewal |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2006-01-23 | 15 GNSL S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-07-24 | 16 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-01-24 | 17 RCSC S: |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-07-31 | 18 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-08-02 | 19 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-08-02 | 20 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-02-02 | 21 RCSC S: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2008-08-02 | 22 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2008-08-02 | 23 RCCK S: |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2008-08-07 | 24 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-08-07 | 25 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2008-08-07 | 26 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2009-03-05 | 27 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2009-03-05 | 28 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.