Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78569897 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Matthew T. Sarles |
Law Office Assigned | L20 |
Employee Name | WEBSTER, WILLIAM M |
1997-08-04 | Date of First Use |
2005-02-17 | Application Filed |
2006-10-17 | Published for Opposition |
2010-02-06 | Abandon |
2010-02-06 | Location: TTAB |
2010-02-06 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 1777 South Bellaire Street, Suite 230 Denver CO 80218 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | CO |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 0 |
U.S. Codes: | B |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CS0000 | The mark certifies that the authorized individual has met minimum standards of experience, knowledge, ethics and written examination requirements established by the certifier in the field of financial, medical and social issues pertaining to senior citizens. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2005-03-01 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-09-14 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-09-15 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2005-09-15 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-03-07 | 5 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-03-08 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-03-23 | 7 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-03-28 | 8 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2006-03-28 | 9 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2006-08-19 | 10 CNEA R:Renewal |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2006-08-19 | 11 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2006-08-19 | 12 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | 2006-08-21 | 13 CNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2006-08-25 | 14 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2006-08-31 | 15 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2006-09-01 | 16 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2006-09-15 | 17 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2006-09-27 | 18 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2006-10-17 | 19 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2006-11-13 | 20 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2007-04-12 | 21 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2009-09-29 | 22 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2009-09-29 | 23 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2010-02-06 | 24 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2010-02-06 | 25 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2010-02-06 | 26 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | 2010-02-08 | 27 MAB4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.