LILLY PULITZER
Sugartown Worldwide, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78516052 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Jeffrey H. Kaufman |
| Attorney Docket Number | 261887US-33 |
| Law Office Assigned | L30 |
| Employee Name | SPARACINO, MARK V |
Timeline
| 2004-09-17 | Date of First Use |
| 2004-11-12 | Application Filed |
| 2008-10-20 | Abandon |
| 2008-10-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2008-10-21 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Sugartown Worldwide, Inc. |
| Address | 800 Third Avenue King of Prussia PA 194061412 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | PA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 050103 | Palm trees |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 32 |
| U.S. Codes: | 045,046,048 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The colors pink and green are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-11-18 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-11-23 | 2 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-11-23 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2004-12-10 | 4 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-06-17 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-06-23 | 6 CPRA R:Renewal |
| PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-06-23 | 7 GPRA F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-12-23 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-12-23 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-01-17 | 10 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-02-04 | 11 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2006-02-04 | 12 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-08-04 | 13 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2006-08-09 | 14 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2006-08-11 | 15 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2006-08-11 | 16 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-08-04 | 17 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-08-12 | 18 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2006-10-30 | 19 CNCF S: |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2006-10-30 | 20 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2007-10-10 | 21 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2008-10-20 | 22 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2008-10-21 | 23 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2008-10-20 | 24 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2008-10-21 | 25 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 