Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 78515303 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | 29150-4000 |
Attorney Docket Number | Heidi L. Sa |
Law Office Assigned | M60 |
Employee Name | SOUDERS, MICHAEL J |
2004-11-11 | Application Filed |
2007-02-23 | Abandon |
2007-04-12 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2007-04-12 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | aQuantive, Inc. |
Address | Suite 1800 821 Second Avenue Seattle WA 98104 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | WA |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0421 | Non-downloadable computer software in the field of business and advertising services, namely, automated advertising services that allow advertisers to determine the value of advertising media based on information regarding the viewer of the media, and allow them to resell media that is not desirable, by directing the unwanted media to a network of online advertisers to whom the media is more desirable; non-downloadable computer software for media planning for others and strategic purchasing of advertisement space for others; non-downloadable computer software for managing, tracking and evaluating media planning, media buying and the success of marketing efforts of others |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-11-16 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-06-16 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-06-16 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-06-16 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-12-14 | 5 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-12-14 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2006-01-03 | 7 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2006-01-20 | 8 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2006-01-20 | 9 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2006-07-20 | 10 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2006-07-20 | 11 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2006-07-20 | 12 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2006-07-20 | 13 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-07-20 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-08-03 | 15 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2006-08-22 | 16 CNCF S: |
ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2006-08-22 | 17 GECG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL DSMSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | 2007-02-17 | 18 EXFB T:TTAB Proceeding |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2007-04-12 | 19 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2007-04-12 | 20 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2007-04-12 | 21 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.