Examiners Amendment

KROGER

The Kroger Co. of Michigan

TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78483412 - KROGER - 061148/03119

To: The Kroger Co. of Michigan (sftrademarks@pillsburywinthrop.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 78483412 - KROGER - 061148/03119
Sent: 7/22/05 5:03:49 PM
Sent As: ECOM101@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 78/483412

 

    APPLICANT:         The Kroger Co.  of Michigan

 

      

 

*78483412*         

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

LAURA C.  GUSTAFSON

PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP

CALENDAR DOCKETING DEPARTMENT

PO BOX 7880

SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120-7880

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

If no fees are enclosed, the address should include the words "Box Responses - No Fee."

    MARK:          KROGER

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   061148/03119

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 sftrademarks@pillsburywinthrop.com

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4.  Your telephone number and email address.

 

 

Serial Number  78/483412

 

 

EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT

 

OFFICE RECORDS SEARCH:  The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

ADVISORY – AMENDMENTS TO GOODS/SERVICES:  If the identification of goods and/or services has been amended below, any future amendments must be in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a) and TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

AMENDMENT(S) AUTHORIZED:  As authorized by Mr. Richard Kirkpatrick on July 22, 2005, the application is amended as noted below.  If applicant disagrees with or objects to any of the amendments below, please notify the undersigned trademark examining attorney immediately.  Otherwise, no response is necessary.  TMEP §707.

 

The 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusal based on U.S. Registration No. 2310549 is withdrawn.  Also, the requirement for a new drawing that agrees with the mark on the specimen or a substitute specimen that shows use of the mark as it appears on the drawing is withdrawn.

 

2(f) Claim – Acquired Distinctiveness

 

The applicant amends the application to seek registration on the Principal Register under Trademark Act Section 2(f), 15 U.S.C. §1052(f), based on acquired distinctiveness.  

 

The following written statement claiming acquired distinctiveness is entered:

 

The mark has become distinctive of the services as evidenced by ownership of U.S. Registration No. 0813182 on the Principal Register for the same mark for related goods or services.

 

37 C.F.R. §2.41(b); TMEP §§1212.04 et seq.

 

Claim of Ownership of Prior Registrations

 

The following claim of ownership is added to the record:

 

            Applicant is the owner of U.S. Registration Nos. 0434669, 0692506, 0813182, and others.

 

37 C.F.R. §2.36; TMEP §812.

 

 

 

 

/Andrew Rhim/

Attorney-Adviser

Law Office 101

phone (571) 272-9711

fax (571) 273-9101

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed