MBOX
Fort Point Partners, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78410845 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Tamara L. Thompson |
| Attorney Docket Number | 13 |
| Law Office Assigned | L30 |
| Employee Name | FAINT, MARY CATHERINE |
Timeline
| 2004-04-29 | Application Filed |
| 2005-12-21 | Abandon |
| 2007-03-21 | Location: PETITIONS OFFICE |
| 2007-03-21 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Fort Point Partners, Inc. |
| Address | Pier One, Bay 3 San Francisco CA 94111 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 35 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0351 | The display of marketing content of its clients on Web sites for use by such clients with our testing and analysis services |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-05-07 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-11-24 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2004-11-25 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2004-11-25 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2005-05-25 | 5 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-05-25 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-06-07 | 7 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2005-06-20 | 8 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2005-06-20 | 9 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2006-01-16 | 10 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2006-01-17 | 11 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-03-21 | 12 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2006-03-21 | 13 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | 2006-04-11 | 14 PINM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2006-05-11 | 15 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2006-05-11 | 16 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-05-12 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-05-11 | 18 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-05-23 | 19 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-05-12 | 20 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-05-23 | 21 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | 2006-05-12 | 22 PETL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | 2006-07-31 | 23 PINM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | 2007-01-08 | 24 APET A:Allowance for Publication |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | 2007-03-21 | 25 PETD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 