CUSTOM
Xtent, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78343833 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Annabelle Danielvarda |
| Attorney Docket Number | 28519-TM1005 |
| Law Office Assigned | L50 |
| Employee Name | BRADLEY, EVELYN W |
Timeline
| 2003-12-19 | Application Filed |
| 2006-09-20 | Abandon |
| 2006-11-04 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2006-11-04 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Xtent, Inc. |
| Address | 125 Constitution Drive Menlo Park DE 94025 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 10 |
| U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0101 | Medical devices used in vascular procedures, namely, medical stents, medical stent delivery systems, catheters, angioplasty catheters, drug delivery catheters, vascular introducers, and medical guide wires |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-01-07 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-06-23 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2004-06-24 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-12-28 | 4 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-12-28 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-01-19 | 6 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2005-02-11 | 7 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2005-02-11 | 8 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-07-29 | 9 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-07-29 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-08-05 | 11 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2005-08-26 | 12 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2005-08-26 | 13 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-02-13 | 14 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2006-02-13 | 15 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2006-02-23 | 16 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2006-02-24 | 17 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2006-02-27 | 18 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2006-02-27 | 19 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | 2006-03-21 | 20 CNCF S: |
| ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | 2006-03-21 | 21 RECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL DSMSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | 2006-06-28 | 22 EXFB T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2006-10-18 | 23 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2006-11-04 | 24 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2006-11-06 | 25 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 