PSYCHO
Big Pig, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78249582 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Ava K. Doppelt |
| Attorney Docket Number | 32886 |
| Law Office Assigned | L30 |
| Employee Name | CHISOLM, KEVON |
Timeline
| 1986-00-00 | Date of First Use |
| 2003-05-14 | Application Filed |
| 2008-01-29 | Abandon |
| 2008-01-29 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2008-01-30 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Big Pig, Inc. |
| Address | 1302 Orange Avenue Winter Park FL 32789 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | FL |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 25 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0251 | Clothing, namely, hats, caps, jackets, t-shirts, aprons, shirts, blouses, shorts, pants, sweatshirts, sweat pants sold in connection with its restaurant services at its website and restaurants |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-10-09 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-10-12 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2004-04-12 | 3 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-04-13 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2004-06-05 | 5 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2005-01-07 | 6 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2005-01-07 | 7 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2005-03-03 | 8 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2005-03-03 | 9 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2005-03-03 | 10 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2005-03-03 | 11 PROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2005-03-03 | 12 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-03-03 | 13 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-03-03 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-04-14 | 15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2005-09-13 | 16 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-05-22 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2006-05-25 | 18 CNES R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2006-05-25 | 19 GNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2006-06-19 | 20 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | 2006-11-16 | 21 EXAR T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2007-01-31 | 22 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2008-01-29 | 23 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2008-01-31 | 24 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 