MAXGRIP
Vetus B.v.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78215841 |
| Registration Number | 2951316 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | John L. Welch |
| Attorney Name | Ronald E. Shapiro |
| Attorney Docket Number | CPA8340 |
| Law Office Assigned | M30 |
| Employee Name | HAYES, GINA CLARK |
Timeline
| 2003-02-18 | Application Filed |
| 2004-10-05 | Published for Opposition |
| 2005-05-17 | Trademark Registered |
| 2010-10-22 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 |
| 2015-12-18 | Cancelled |
| 2015-12-18 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  VETUS B.V. |
| Entity Statement | BESLOTEN VENNOOTSCHAP (PRIVATE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) |
| Address | FOKKERSTRAAT 571 3125 BD SCHIEDAM NL |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | NL |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 7 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,019,021,023,031,034,035 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0071 | winches and windlass drums |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-07-22 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-07-22 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-11-05 | 3 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-11-05 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2004-01-15 | 5 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-05-12 | 6 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-05-12 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-06-16 | 8 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2004-09-15 | 9 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2004-10-05 | 10 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-07-19 | 11 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2004-12-28 | 12 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | 2005-01-19 | 13 D1BR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | 2005-01-31 | 14 IUCN S: |
| 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | 2005-01-31 | 15 DP1B I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2005-05-17 | 16 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2007-12-03 | 17 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2008-10-22 | 18 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2010-10-15 | 19 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2010-10-22 | 20 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2010-10-22 | 21 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2013-10-23 | 22 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2015-12-18 | 23 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 