Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78210526 |
Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
Domestic Representative | William M. Borchard, Esq. |
Attorney Name | William M. Borchard |
Attorney Docket Number | 2509701/WMB/ |
Law Office Assigned | M60 |
Employee Name | COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A |
2003-02-04 | Application Filed |
2008-12-29 | Abandon |
2009-01-22 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2009-01-22 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | GROVE, 21 PINE ROAD BELLEVILLE, ST. MI BB BB11113 |
Legal Entity Type | Company |
Legal Entity State | BB |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
260303 | Incomplete ovals; Ovals, incomplete |
260321 | Ovals that are completely or partially shaded |
International Codes: | 3 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
DM0000 | The mark consists of The word "DLISH" in stylized letters bordered by the right by half an oval figure. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-07-30 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-07-31 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-02-02 | 3 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-01-30 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2004-03-04 | 5 GNSL S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2004-10-26 | 6 RCSC S: |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-03-07 | 7 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2005-07-15 | 8 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-01-26 | 9 RCSC S: |
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2006-03-09 | 10 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2006-03-09 | 11 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-08-18 | 12 RCSC S: |
AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2006-09-27 | 13 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2006-12-06 | 14 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-02-27 | 15 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-02-27 | 16 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-09-27 | 17 RCSC S: |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2008-02-29 | 18 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2008-03-04 | 19 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2008-03-04 | 20 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2008-06-13 | 21 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2008-06-25 | 22 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2008-06-25 | 23 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2008-06-25 | 24 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2009-01-22 | 25 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2009-01-22 | 26 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.