CHOICE DM
Hi-tech Pharmacal Co., Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78197271 |
| Registration Number | 2972933 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Linda S. Chan; Samson Helfgott; Michael F. Sarney; Karen |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN E |
Timeline
| 2002-12-23 | Application Filed |
| 2003-05-20 | Date of First Use |
| 2003-12-09 | Published for Opposition |
| 2005-06-06 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2005-07-19 | Trademark Registered |
| 2012-02-24 | Cancelled |
| 2012-02-24 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC. |
| Address | 369 BAYVIEW AVENUE AMITYVILLE DE 11701 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 30 |
| U.S. Codes: | 046 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "DM" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-06-11 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2003-06-12 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2003-08-27 | 3 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-08-27 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-10-01 | 5 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-11-19 | 6 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-12-09 | 7 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2004-03-02 | 8 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2004-03-09 | 9 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2004-03-09 | 10 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2004-03-19 | 11 EX1G S: |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2005-02-23 | 12 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2005-02-23 | 13 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2005-03-12 | 14 EX2G S: |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2005-03-23 | 15 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2005-03-23 | 16 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2005-04-13 | 17 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2005-04-14 | 18 CNPR P: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2005-04-15 | 19 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2005-04-20 | 20 REGV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2005-07-19 | 21 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2006-08-16 | 22 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2006-08-30 | 23 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2006-09-22 | 24 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2006-09-22 | 25 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2012-02-24 | 26 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 