Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 78179029 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Domestic Representative | ARENT FOX PLLC |
Attorney Name | CRISTINA A. CARVALHO |
Law Office Assigned | L20 |
Employee Name | THOMAS JR, RAY |
2002-10-28 | Application Filed |
2003-08-26 | Published for Opposition |
2006-06-01 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 |
2006-11-19 | Abandon |
2006-11-19 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Ebel International Ltd. |
Address | Cedar House 41 Cedar Avenue Hamilton BM HM 12 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | BM |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 3 |
U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0031 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIPSTICK; LIP GLOSS; LIP LINER; NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM; LIP PENCILS; MASCARA; BLUSH; EYE SHADOWS; EYE PENCILS; FOUNDATION MAKE-UP; EYELINERS; FACIAL CONCEALER; COSMETIC PENCILS AND FACE POWDER; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH AND SHOWER SOAPS; SKIN MOISTURIZERS; BODY LOTIONS; ASTRINGENTS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; FACE AND SKIN CLEANSERS; FACIAL MASKS; FACE AND BODY SCRUBS AND FRAGRANCE PRODUCTS FOR PERSONAL USE, NAMELY, PERFUMES; COLOGNES; EAU DE TOILETTE; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE AND INCENSE. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-03-24 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-04-10 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2003-05-15 | 3 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-05-15 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-07-02 | 5 CNSA P: |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-08-06 | 6 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-08-26 | 7 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2003-11-18 | 8 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2004-02-25 | 9 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2004-02-25 | 10 EXT1 S: |
EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2004-02-25 | 11 EX1G S: |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-07-16 | 12 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
FAX RECEIVED | 2004-08-27 | 13 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-10-21 | 14 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2004-10-21 | 15 EXT2 S: |
EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2004-11-10 | 16 EX2G S: |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-04-28 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2005-04-28 | 18 EXT3 S: |
EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2005-05-20 | 19 EX3G S: |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-10-18 | 20 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2005-10-18 | 21 EXT4 S: |
EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2005-11-07 | 22 EX4G S: |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-05-16 | 23 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2006-05-16 | 24 EXT5 S: |
EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2006-05-30 | 25 EX5G S: |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2006-06-01 | 26 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2007-01-23 | 27 ABN6 S: |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2007-01-23 | 28 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.