PURE POWER
Pure Energy Visions Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78176887 |
| Registration Number | 3067338 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | George Gottlieb |
| Attorney Name | David Rogers |
| Attorney Docket Number | 220-60 |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | LOUGHRAN, BARBARA ANNE |
Timeline
| 1999-05-10 | Date of First Use |
| 2002-10-22 | Application Filed |
| 2005-12-20 | Published for Opposition |
| 2006-03-14 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2006-03-14 | Trademark Registered |
| 2012-10-19 | Cancelled |
| 2012-10-19 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  PURE ENERGY VISIONS INC. |
| Address | 35 POLLARD STREET RICHMOND HILL M4B 1A8 ONC |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | ONC |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "POWER" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-03-20 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-03-31 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2003-09-30 | 3 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-09-30 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EMAIL RECEIVED | 2003-10-02 | 5 EMRV E:E-Mail |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-10-01 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2003-11-03 | 7 GNSL S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2004-12-03 | 8 RCCK S: |
| SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | 2005-01-29 | 9 CNSI R:Renewal |
| INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2005-01-29 | 10 GNSI S: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-07-29 | 11 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-07-29 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-08-02 | 13 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2005-08-22 | 14 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2005-08-22 | 15 GNSL S: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2005-10-17 | 16 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-10-17 | 17 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2005-10-24 | 18 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2005-10-24 | 19 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2005-11-02 | 20 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2005-11-02 | 21 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2005-11-30 | 22 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2005-12-20 | 23 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2006-03-14 | 24 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2012-10-19 | 25 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 