Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 78163617 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Attorney Name | S. Roxanne Edwards |
Attorney Docket Number | 67176387-100 |
Law Office Assigned | M30 |
Employee Name | BLANDU, FLORENTINA |
2002-09-12 | Application Filed |
2005-02-02 | Abandon |
2005-04-06 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2005-04-06 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 5040 Shoram Place, Suite 150 San Diego CA 92122 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | CA |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Computer transaction tokens used to store transaction information, transaction account information, and security information, namely, computer discs, computer cassettes, computer cartridges, electronic chip cards and electronic apparatus for recording and storing data, which contain programming used to engage in on-line transactions using the stored information and for generating pop-up advertising |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-01-31 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2003-02-11 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2003-07-03 | 3 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-08-01 | 4 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-08-27 | 5 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-08-01 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2003-11-14 | 7 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-02-05 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-02-05 | 9 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
FAX RECEIVED | 2004-03-03 | 10 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-03-03 | 11 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-05-17 | 12 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2004-05-17 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2004-05-21 | 14 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-05-17 | 15 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2004-05-26 | 16 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-05-26 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | 2004-08-02 | 18 GECD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXPARTE APPEAL DSMSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | 2004-12-09 | 19 EXFB T:TTAB Proceeding |
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2005-04-02 | 20 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2005-04-06 | 21 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2005-04-06 | 22 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-12-02 | 23 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2006-11-09 | 24 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2006-11-09 | 25 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.