UNCONVENTIONAL THINKING. EXCEPTIONAL RESULTS.
Telution, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78125712 |
| Registration Number | 2861274 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Law Office Assigned | M70 |
| Employee Name | ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WIL |
Timeline
| 2002-05-02 | Application Filed |
| 2003-06-24 | Published for Opposition |
| 2004-03-16 | Date of First Use |
| 2004-07-06 | Trademark Registered |
| 2004-07-20 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2011-02-11 | Cancelled |
| 2011-02-11 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Telution, Inc. |
| Address | 65 E. Wacker Place Suite 600 Chicago DE 60601 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | computer software for use in providing customer care, order management and billing for companies in the field of telecommunications |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-09-10 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-09-23 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-03-06 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2003-03-24 | 4 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-03-26 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-03-25 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-04-29 | 7 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-06-04 | 8 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-06-24 | 9 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2003-09-16 | 10 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-03-19 | 11 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2004-03-16 | 12 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2004-04-01 | 13 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-04-07 | 14 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-04-12 | 15 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-04-12 | 16 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2004-04-16 | 17 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-07-06 | 18 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2010-01-21 | 19 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2011-02-11 | 20 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 UNCONVENTIONAL THINKING. EXCEPTIONAL RESULTS. 78125712 2861274 Dead/Cancelled |
Telution, Inc. 2002-05-02 |
 UNCONVENTIONAL THINKING. EXCEPTIONAL RESULTS. 76226774 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
Telution, Inc 2001-03-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 