VERITAG
Applied Digital Solutions, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78119047 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Scott J. Asmus |
| Attorney Docket Number | ADSX23 |
| Law Office Assigned | M30 |
| Employee Name | HICKEY, SUSAN E |
Timeline
| 2002-04-02 | Application Filed |
| 2002-07-17 | Date of First Use |
| 2003-06-10 | Published for Opposition |
| 2004-10-06 | Abandon |
| 2005-01-09 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2005-01-09 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. |
| Address | 400 Royal Palm Way Ste. 410 Palm Beach MO 33480 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | MO |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| International Codes: | 38 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,104 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Electronic device, namely attachable or implantable microchip that transmits data and location information in order to identify, monitor and manage transported baggage and cargo including the monitoring of the environmental parameters, status, and geographic location of the baggage and cargo for the airline, railway and shipping industry |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-07-24 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-08-07 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-11-12 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2003-03-21 | 4 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-03-21 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-04-17 | 6 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-05-21 | 7 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-06-10 | 8 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2003-09-02 | 9 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-12-31 | 10 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2003-12-31 | 11 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2003-12-31 | 12 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-02-06 | 13 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-02-11 | 14 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2004-04-06 | 15 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2005-01-09 | 16 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2005-01-10 | 17 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 VERITAG 86814482 4988529 Live/Registered |
DOCSOLID, LLC 2015-11-09 |
 VERITAG 78119047 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. 2002-04-02 |
 VERITAG 75540371 2421876 Dead/Cancelled |
ImageTag, Inc. 1998-08-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 