MILLIPEDE
Millipede, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78108266 |
| Registration Number | 2880212 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Law Office Assigned | M10 |
| Employee Name | WOOD, CAROLINE |
Timeline
| 2002-02-12 | Application Filed |
| 2002-10-22 | Published for Opposition |
| 2003-01-15 | Date of First Use |
| 2004-08-31 | Trademark Registered |
| 2004-09-09 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2011-04-01 | Cancelled |
| 2011-04-01 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  MILLIPEDE, INC. |
| Address | 133 GREVILLIA DRIVE PETALUMA CA 94952 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 10 |
| U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0101 | Medical apparatus, namely, Orthopedic Article for foot/arch support for plantar facitis, diabetic foot problems, sport injury, heel pain |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-06-24 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2002-06-28 | 2 GNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2002-07-01 | 3 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-07-01 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-08-09 | 5 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-10-02 | 6 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-10-22 | 7 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2003-01-14 | 8 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2003-09-25 | 9 ABN6 S: |
| TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | 2003-11-06 | 10 EISU I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-11-12 | 11 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-11-17 | 12 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2003-11-17 | 13 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | 2004-04-05 | 14 PINM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2004-04-19 | 15 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | 2004-04-19 | 16 PETL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2004-05-13 | 17 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2003-07-14 | 18 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2003-09-10 | 19 EX1G S: |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2003-11-06 | 20 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2004-05-17 | 21 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-05-28 | 22 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2004-06-12 | 23 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-08-31 | 24 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2007-01-19 | 25 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2011-04-01 | 26 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 