E-QUOTE
Frontline PCB solutions ltd.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 78097430 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Domestic Representative | Naomi Assia (at care of Mr. Arie Sternberg) |
| Law Office Assigned | M30 |
| Employee Name | SAPPENFIELD, ANN ELIZA |
Timeline
| 2000-10-10 | Date of First Use |
| 2001-12-10 | Application Filed |
| 2005-05-23 | Amend to Register |
| 2006-04-03 | Abandon |
| 2006-04-30 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2006-04-30 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Frontline PCB solutions ltd. |
| Address | P.O. box 680 Yavne IL 81106 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | IL |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | A computer software product for providing comprehensive, automatic, accurate and immediate sales information for the PCB industry |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-03-19 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-07-09 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-10-24 | 3 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-10-24 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2002-12-08 | 5 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2003-02-23 | 6 GNSL S: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-08-31 | 7 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2004-08-29 | 8 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-11-02 | 9 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2005-03-28 | 10 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2005-03-29 | 11 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2005-04-19 | 12 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-05-23 | 13 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | 2005-04-19 | 14 PETR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | 2005-07-28 | 15 PETG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2005-04-19 | 16 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-04-19 | 17 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-08-26 | 18 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-05-23 | 19 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-08-26 | 20 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-10-02 | 21 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2005-10-02 | 22 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2006-04-30 | 23 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2006-05-01 | 24 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 